Skip to content

revert: remove one-way OpenClaw integration#2619

Merged
code-yeongyu merged 2 commits intodevfrom
revert/openclaw-one-way
Mar 16, 2026
Merged

revert: remove one-way OpenClaw integration#2619
code-yeongyu merged 2 commits intodevfrom
revert/openclaw-one-way

Conversation

@code-yeongyu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@code-yeongyu code-yeongyu commented Mar 16, 2026

Reverts PR #2607 and #2609. The one-way (opencode→OpenClaw) integration was the wrong direction. Will be replaced with a proper bidirectional integration following the omx pattern.


Summary by cubic

Reverts the one-way OpenClaw integration (#2607, #2609) and removes its code, config, and hooks. Restores previous behavior while we prepare a bidirectional integration following the omx pattern.

  • Refactors
    • Removed src/openclaw/* modules and tests (client, dispatcher, types).
    • Dropped openclaw config schema and hook entry points (hooks.ts, oh-my-opencode-config.ts).
    • Removed openclaw-sender from session hooks and event/tool pipelines.

Written for commit 239da8b. Summary will update on new commits.

…omo-env"

This reverts commit 4759dfb, reversing
changes made to 8213534.
…gration"

This reverts commit 8213534, reversing
changes made to 84fb111.
@code-yeongyu code-yeongyu merged commit 427fa6d into dev Mar 16, 2026
5 checks passed
@code-yeongyu code-yeongyu deleted the revert/openclaw-one-way branch March 16, 2026 12:09
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues found across 14 files

Confidence score: 5/5

  • Automated review surfaced no issues in the provided summaries.
  • No files require special attention.

Auto-approved: Clean revert of a self-contained feature. All integration points (hooks, config schemas, and call sites) are removed. Returns system to a known good state with no risk of regressions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant