Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

implement TLSSocket and connect from node:tls #3594

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 6, 2025
Merged

Conversation

anonrig
Copy link
Member

@anonrig anonrig commented Feb 23, 2025

Adds node:tls module as well as _tls_wrap. Includes the following methods/classes:

  1. TLSSocket
  2. connect()

@anonrig anonrig force-pushed the yagiz/introduce-tls branch 2 times, most recently from 1fb6373 to e77192f Compare February 24, 2025 01:28
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 24, 2025

The generated output of @cloudflare/workers-types matches the snapshot in types/generated-snapshot 🎉

@cloudflare cloudflare deleted a comment from github-actions bot Feb 24, 2025
@danlapid
Copy link
Collaborator

Nice!
Glad to see this progressing!

@anonrig anonrig force-pushed the yagiz/introduce-tls branch 8 times, most recently from 7968547 to a8848ab Compare February 26, 2025 16:11
@anonrig anonrig force-pushed the yagiz/introduce-tls branch 11 times, most recently from 5c957db to 57490be Compare February 28, 2025 22:50
@anonrig anonrig marked this pull request as ready for review February 28, 2025 22:53
@anonrig anonrig requested review from a team as code owners February 28, 2025 22:53
@anonrig anonrig requested a review from erikcorry February 28, 2025 22:53
@anonrig anonrig force-pushed the yagiz/introduce-tls branch from bd7157b to 2018d2d Compare March 5, 2025 19:35
@anonrig anonrig force-pushed the yagiz/introduce-tls branch from 4864e5c to 57ae248 Compare March 6, 2025 20:37
@anonrig anonrig enabled auto-merge (rebase) March 6, 2025 20:46
@anonrig anonrig merged commit 4e753b6 into main Mar 6, 2025
25 of 27 checks passed
@anonrig anonrig deleted the yagiz/introduce-tls branch March 6, 2025 21:22
@anonrig
Copy link
Member Author

anonrig commented Mar 6, 2025

cc @vicb @petebacondarwin once we have an EW release, we should update unenv to not polyfill these...

cc @irvinebroque @mikenomitch it might be good to include this in a changelog entry

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants