Repository navigation
Description
Preliminary Checks
-
I have reviewed the documentation: https://clerk.com/docs
-
I have searched for existing issues: https://github.com/clerk/javascript/issues
-
I have not already reached out to Clerk support via email or Discord (if you have, no need to open an issue here)
-
This issue is not a question, general help request, or anything other than a bug report directly related to Clerk. Please ask questions in our Discord community: https://clerk.com/discord.
Reproduction
https://github.com/clerk/javascript
Publishable key
pk_test_1234
Description
Summary
I'm using the Future custom-flow hooks (useSignIn() from @clerk/nextjs, not /legacy). When I reset an in-progress sign-in, the reset doesn't propagate a new empty SignInFuture resource to the hook's signIn. The only way I've found to get the live post-reset resource at call-time is the internal clerk.client.signIn.__internal_future. Your support team confirmed this: "our existing reset pathway doesn't result in the propagation of a new empty SignIn for the new hooks."
Environment
@clerk/[email protected]@clerk/[email protected][email protected]- Default import:
import { useSignIn } from '@clerk/nextjs'(Future API, not/legacy)
Reproduction
Custom SSO flow built on useSignIn():
- Leave an in-progress
SignIn. Easiest way is to start a discoverable passkey (signIn.passkey({ flow: 'discoverable' })) and then dismiss the WebAuthn prompt, which persists asignInwith anid. - In a single click handler, call
await signIn.reset()(orclerk.client.resetSignIn()). - Immediately call
await signIn.sso({ strategy: 'oauth_google', redirectUrl, redirectCallbackUrl }).
Expected
sso() starts a fresh OAuth attempt and navigates to the provider.
Actual
sso() PATCH-continues the stale (pre-reset) SignIn and resolves without navigating, so the SSO button just hangs. The signIn reference captured in my handler's closure is the pre-reset one, and since the SignInFuture resource has an intentionally unstable identity and reset doesn't refresh the hook's value, the closure can never see the new resource within the same handler. A memo dep array only affects future invocations, not the one that's already running.
Workaround
I read the live resource at call-time from the internal field:
if (clerk.client?.signIn.id) clerk.client.resetSignIn();
const resource = clerk.client?.signIn.__internal_future ?? signIn;
await resource.sso({ ... });This leans on __internal_future, which is internal and can break between minor versions, for what's otherwise a completely ordinary flow (reset a stale sign-in, then start SSO).
Suggested fixes (any one of these would let me drop __internal_future)
reset()resolves with the freshSignInFutureresource, or- a public accessor for the live resource (something like
clerk.client.signInFuture), or reset()propagates a new emptySignInto theuseSignIn()hook so callingsso()on the hook'ssignInworks after a reset.
Environment
I was told by support I didn't need to provide any of this:
> Thanks for the info! I think the best way to follow this would be to file an issue on our GitHub repo for the JavaScript SDKs https://github.com/clerk/javascript. A minimal reproduction would be incredible if you can toss one together, but totally fine if not. I took a quick look and I do think you're right on the money that our existing reset pathway doesn't result in the propagation of a new empty SignIn for the new hooks.
Activity
hiSandog commentedon Jul 5, 2026
This seems like a good place for a focused docs example: show the smallest setup that demonstrates “
signIn.reset()/client.resetSignIn()don't propagate a fresh empty SignIn to the FutureuseSignIn()hoo”, then state the expected output or UI state. That would make thesignIn.reset()case testable for users instead of leaving it as a general note.pcbeingused333 commentedon Nov 11, 2026
Reading current main (
a331f11d),SignInFuture.reset()callsclient.resetSignIn(), which creates a newSignIn, but the captured Future retains its readonly#resourcepointing to the previous attempt. As a result,sso()can still see the old ID and skip creating a fresh sign-in, which appears to explain the stale-resource behavior reported here. Would you prefer a focused fix that rebinds#resourceafterSignInFuture.reset(), with a Vitest regression covering the captured Future's cleared ID and a fresh sign-in POST when SSO starts, or resolving the live client resource at call time? The focused fix would addressawait signIn.reset(); await signIn.sso(...)on the same captured Future, but would not cover callingclerk.client.resetSignIn()directly while retaining that Future. I can put together a PR with the regression test and a patch changeset once you confirm the preferred approach.