test: don't rely on append() to copy base slice#1367
Merged
ti-mo merged 1 commit intocilium:mainfrom Mar 4, 2024
Merged
Conversation
TestProgramVerifierLogTruncated broke when upgrading from Go 1.21.7 to 1.22.0. The test implicitly relied on append() performing a copy() behind the scenes when the base slice is grown beyond 32 elements, but Go 1.22 changed something about when and how this growing takes place. We shouldn't depend on this behaviour. Signed-off-by: Timo Beckers <[email protected]>
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
TestProgramVerifierLogTruncated broke when upgrading from Go 1.21.7 to 1.22.0. The test implicitly relied on append() performing a copy() behind the scenes when the base slice is grown beyond 32 elements, but Go 1.22 changed something about when and how this growing takes place. We shouldn't depend on this behaviour.
Made an issue about this upstream (golang/go#66093) just in case this was not intended.