Revert "multi-pool: add support for excluding IP pools from masquerade"#43379
Merged
Revert "multi-pool: add support for excluding IP pools from masquerade"#43379
Conversation
gandro
added
the
release-note/misc
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
added
the
dont-merge/needs-sign-off
This reverts commit dee8d13. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Wicki <[email protected]>
gandro
force-pushed
the
revert-40132-addsnatexclusion
branch
from
7eff411 to
57bd97d
Compare
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
removed
the
dont-merge/needs-sign-off
Member
Author
|
/test |
Member
Author
|
Relevant CI is green. Force-merging to unblock CI. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reverts #40132
Unfortunately, the PR introduced a common CI flake: #40132 (comment)
cc @cilium/maintainers can we merge this without a review from all code owners?
cc @alimehrabikoshki