Skip to content

About

Backup integrity verifier: a backup you never verified is a rumor. Manifest, tamper-evident verify, checklist.

Topics

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Repository files navigation

backup-gate

backup-gate

A backup you have never verified is a rumor.
one file · zero dependencies · stdlib only

tests python deps license


The failure this catches

  • You assumed there was a backup; at restore time the manifest was six months old and half the files were gone.
  • The backup job has been green for three years and has never once been restored.
  • Files changed, hashes no longer match the manifest, and nobody ever compared them.

One command, on a file you already have:

python gate.py verify examples/data
Real output — produced by the bundled examples/, not a mock-up
backup-gate report
================================
ERROR  notes.md                     hash-mismatch      sha256 differs from manifest
summary: declared=2 on_disk=2 missing=0 extra=0 mismatch=1 errors=1 warnings=0
verdict: FAIL: 1 integrity error(s)

What it does

  • Builds a SHA-256 manifest, then verifies content, presence, and freshness.
  • Reports exact mismatched and missing paths — not just a count.
  • Text or JSON; cheap enough to run nightly.

What it does not do

  • It is a verifier, not a backup tool. It does not copy anything anywhere.
  • Freshness checks the manifest age, not whether the data is correct.
  • No offsite, no encryption, no retention policy — pair it with a real backup system.

Being explicit here is cheaper than a wrong expectation later.

Exit codes

0 = manifest matches. 1 = mismatch or tamper. 2 = bad input or missing manifest.

Install

git clone https://github.com/chenhz01/backup-gate
cd backup-gate
python gate.py --help

Python 3.9+. Nothing to pip install — stdlib only.

Use it in CI

- name: backup-gate
  run: python gate.py verify examples/data

Use it as a GitHub Action

action.yml is included, so you can call this repo directly as a composite action.

# .github/workflows/gates.yml
- uses: actions/checkout@v4

- uses: chenhz01/[email protected]
  with:
    # IMPORTANT: this path is inside YOUR repository.
    # The examples/ in this repo are NOT in your workspace — pass your own files.
    args: "verify path/to/data"

Pin the tag (@v0.1.3) rather than @main — main moves. Check Releases for the newest tag; v0.1.0 predates the fix that makes a mistyped path fail instead of silently passing.

If you omit args, the action only prints help and exits 0. It raises a warning annotation — quoting this gate's own correct usage — so a green check is never mistaken for "it inspected my files".

中文速览

备份门 — 没有验证过的备份,只是一个传闻。

  • 以为有备份,真要用时发现清单是半年前的,还少了一半文件。
  • 备份任务绿了三年,没人试过一次还原。
  • 文件被人改过,哈希值和清单对不上,但没人比对过。

一行命令:python gate.py verify examples/data

边界:It is a verifier, not a backup tool. It does not copy anything anywhere.

互推:只装一个的话,装哪个

十五个链接是迷宫,一个症状是门。按上表挑一个,其余九个在下面 The gates。 每个仓都能单独活:复制 gate.py,一条命令跑完,不共享运行时、不装包、不加配置。 有星就给这一个,没有也不影响任何仓的可用性——没有任何门是「先给星才能用」。

热门前置:保证结构,不保证排名

本页承诺的是 15 项可机器复核的结构特征,当前 15/15(2026-10-20 复核)。 GitHub 从未公开 Trending 的排序算法,所以任何「保证上热门」的说法都在描述一件它不可能知道的事; 本仓不这么说。跑 python tools/hotness.py 可自行复算每一条。

Start here (if you install only one)

Fifteen links is a maze; one symptom is a door. Find your symptom, install that gate, ignore the rest until it hurts.

what you are seeing install this
the bill is 10x normal and the trace is a wall of the same step loop-gate
the agent can delete prod and nobody signed off on that permission-gate
answers get worse after truncation and nobody knows what got dropped context-gate
two rules in the prompt contradict each other; the model obeys neither instruction-gate
AI text ships with fabricated links and empty phrases output-gate
half the repo might be dead and nobody can prove which half deadcode-gate

A gate you did not need is a gate you uninstall, so nothing here says "install all fifteen". Each repo stands alone: copy gate.py, run one command, no shared runtime, no package manager, no config file to grow.

On stars. If this one saved you an incident, star it — that is the only signal I get about which gate to build next. There is no exchange: starring one repo does not owe me a star on another, and no gate here is unlocked by a star. Star trading breaks GitHub's rules and would poison the single honest metric this project has.

Hot-ready guarantee

What is guaranteed is structure, not ranking. Fifteen properties, each one machine-checked against this repo — current score 15/15 (2026-10-20).

Plain version: instead of asking you to trust a badge, I list what I actually checked, name the script that checks it, and let you re-run it. If one of these lines is false, that is a bug in my repo, not a matter of taste.

  • Falsifiable side: python tools/hotness.py re-runs every check and prints the evidence line for each one. You do not have to trust this paragraph.
  • Non-falsifiable side: GitHub has never published how Trending sorts repositories, so any repo promising you a guaranteed spot is telling you something it cannot know. This one does not make that promise.
  • If a claim on this page stops being true, that is a bug: open an issue and it gets fixed in the same week, not in the next launch.

What actually carries this repo:

  • the command in this README is byte-for-byte the command CI runs (28-char argv, exact match)
  • the output block is a real run of examples/, not a mock-up (Real output section)
  • CI asserts the exit code, so the badge can turn red — and it has (asserts exit=1)
  • every fixture is committed, so a fresh clone reproduces the output (2 files under examples/ tracked in git)
  • * -text in .gitattributes: same bytes on Windows and Linux (.gitattributes * -text)

The gates

# gate what it stops
02 loop-gate Find where your agent looped, before it burns another run
03 permission-gate Score how much more your agent can do than it should
04 context-gate Measure what truncation deletes, before the model starts guessing
05 instruction-gate Two of your instructions contradict each other. This finds them
06 output-gate Before AI-written text ships, run the four checks it always fails
07 memory-expiry-gate Give every memory a TTL, then prove the expiry semantics actually hold
08 drift-gate When embeddings drift, retrieval quietly rots. Fingerprint it
09 price-gate Your cost model is only as good as the price table under it
10 complexity-ceiling Per-file complexity budgets that fail the build instead of the reviewer
11 deadcode-gate Quantify how much of the repo is dead, instead of guessing
12 docrot-gate Docs don't die at once. They rot one stale command at a time
13 leak-gate Scan for internal detail before the doc leaves the building
14 backup-gate ← you are here A backup you have never verified is a rumor
15 trail-gate Hash-chained agent audit trail — and it verifies its own chain

License

Attribution required when you redistribute the documentation; code can be used commercially without a separate agreement. See NOTICE.

About

Backup integrity verifier: a backup you never verified is a rumor. Manifest, tamper-evident verify, checklist.

Topics

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages