Skip to content

Comments

mds: move fscrypt inode_t metadata to mds_co mempool#59414

Merged
batrick merged 4 commits intoceph:mainfrom
batrick:i67687
Sep 5, 2024
Merged

mds: move fscrypt inode_t metadata to mds_co mempool#59414
batrick merged 4 commits intoceph:mainfrom
batrick:i67687

Conversation

@batrick
Copy link
Member

@batrick batrick commented Aug 22, 2024

Contribution Guidelines

  • To sign and title your commits, please refer to Submitting Patches to Ceph.

  • If you are submitting a fix for a stable branch (e.g. "quincy"), please refer to Submitting Patches to Ceph - Backports for the proper workflow.

  • When filling out the below checklist, you may click boxes directly in the GitHub web UI. When entering or editing the entire PR message in the GitHub web UI editor, you may also select a checklist item by adding an x between the brackets: [x]. Spaces and capitalization matter when checking off items this way.

Checklist

  • Tracker (select at least one)
    • References tracker ticket
    • Very recent bug; references commit where it was introduced
    • New feature (ticket optional)
    • Doc update (no ticket needed)
    • Code cleanup (no ticket needed)
  • Component impact
    • Affects Dashboard, opened tracker ticket
    • Affects Orchestrator, opened tracker ticket
    • No impact that needs to be tracked
  • Documentation (select at least one)
    • Updates relevant documentation
    • No doc update is appropriate
  • Tests (select at least one)
Show available Jenkins commands
  • jenkins retest this please
  • jenkins test classic perf
  • jenkins test crimson perf
  • jenkins test signed
  • jenkins test make check
  • jenkins test make check arm64
  • jenkins test submodules
  • jenkins test dashboard
  • jenkins test dashboard cephadm
  • jenkins test api
  • jenkins test docs
  • jenkins render docs
  • jenkins test ceph-volume all
  • jenkins test ceph-volume tox
  • jenkins test windows
  • jenkins test rook e2e

@batrick batrick requested review from a team and lxbsz August 22, 2024 18:40
@github-actions github-actions bot added the cephfs Ceph File System label Aug 22, 2024
@batrick
Copy link
Member Author

batrick commented Aug 23, 2024

jenkins test make check

@batrick
Copy link
Member Author

batrick commented Aug 23, 2024

jenkins test make check arm64

1 similar comment
@batrick
Copy link
Member Author

batrick commented Aug 23, 2024

jenkins test make check arm64

@batrick
Copy link
Member Author

batrick commented Aug 27, 2024

jenkins test make check arm64

@batrick
Copy link
Member Author

batrick commented Aug 27, 2024

@batrick
Copy link
Member Author

batrick commented Aug 29, 2024

@vshankar
Copy link
Contributor

@batrick I'm half way through this change. Will finish up review soon.

Copy link
Contributor

@rishabh-d-dave rishabh-d-dave left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I spent some time with this, looks okay to me. But I must add I am not well acquainted code region, so see my approval accordingly.

EDIT: would be nice if we could add rationale behind this change in commit message and/or in ticket and PR description.

Copy link
Contributor

@chrisphoffman chrisphoffman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you share the verification you did for showing that fscrypt memory usage can now be tracked via mempool? I did some analysis here on my findings.

@batrick
Copy link
Member Author

batrick commented Aug 30, 2024

Can you share the verification you did for showing that fscrypt memory usage can now be tracked via mempool? I did some analysis here on my findings.

I didn't bother verifying it. Your analysis (thanks) looks like this PR worked as should be expected.

Copy link
Contributor

@chrisphoffman chrisphoffman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants