Checklist

• I have checked the issues list
  for similar or identical feature requests.
• I have checked the pull requests list
  for existing proposed implementations of this feature.
• I have checked the commit log
  to find out if the if the same feature was already implemented in the
  master branch.
• I have included all related issues and possible duplicate issues
  in this issue (If there are none, check this box anyway).

Related Issues and Possible Duplicates

Related Issues

• How to use AsyncResult.then in async/await #4353

Possible Duplicates

• How to use AsyncResult.then in async/await #4353

Also related:

• How to combine Celery with asyncio? (StackOverflow question)

Brief Summary

Being able to await an AsyncResult

The goal is to offload CPU intensive tasks to dedicated workers and return a result to the client once the task is completed.

Design

Architectural Considerations

I don't know how to implement this feature, but it seems that this project does:
https://github.com/kai3341/celery-pool-asyncio
However, it's not compatible with Celery 5 (see kai3341/celery-pool-asyncio#29)

Proposed Behavior

Proposed UI/UX

In a Django 3.1 async view:

async def my_view(request):
    result = await my_cpu_intensive_task.delay()
    return HttpResponse(f"Result = {result}")

Diagrams

N/A

Alternatives

I've considered polling AsyncResult.state every second, but it's a very inelegant solution.