Skip to content

chore(deps): lock file maintenance - #1877

Merged
ryoppippi merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/lock-file-maintenance
Oct 13, 2026
Merged

ryoppippi merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/lock-file-maintenance

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Oct 13, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Update Change
lockFileMaintenance All locks refreshed

🔧 This Pull Request updates lock files to use the latest dependency versions.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: defaults
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: bd9c0608-c795-439c-be5e-6acd6e656663

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploying with  Cloudflare Workers  Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

Status Name Latest Commit Preview URL Updated (UTC)
✅ Deployment successful!
View logs
ccusage-guide 3e190bd Commit Preview URL

Branch Preview URL
Oct 13 2026, 07:48 PM

@ryoppippi
ryoppippi merged commit c39aa6e into main Oct 13, 2026
38 of 39 checks passed
@ryoppippi
ryoppippi deleted the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch October 13, 2026 19:57
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ccusage performance comparison

PR SHA: 3e190bda5a19
Base SHA: b95a18635a01

This compares the PR package against the configured base package on the same CI runner.

Package runtime diagnostics

Compares the PR package wrapper, the installed native optional dependency binary, and the workspace release binary on the same large fixture. This identifies whether slow package results come from JavaScript wrapper overhead, the published native binary build, or the Rust core itself.

Fixtures: Claude /home/runner/_work/_temp/ccusage-large-fixture (1.01 GiB, 2597 files), Codex /home/runner/_work/_temp/ccusage-large-codex-fixture (1.01 GiB, 2597 files)
All rows run --offline --json, measured by hyperfine with 0 warmups and 1 runs. This isolates wrapper overhead from the installed native optional dependency and the workspace release binary built on the runner.

Command Runtime Input Median Throughput Samples
claude --offline --json Package wrapper 1.01 GiB 409.5ms 2.46 GiB/s 1
claude --offline --json Installed native binary 1.01 GiB 394.8ms 2.55 GiB/s 1
codex --offline --json Package wrapper 1.01 GiB 155.4ms 6.48 GiB/s 1
codex --offline --json Installed native binary 1.01 GiB 127.2ms 7.91 GiB/s 1

Committed fixture performance

Committed small fixtures for stable PR-to-PR feedback and explicit Claude/Codex command coverage.

Fixtures: Claude apps/ccusage/test/fixtures/claude (0.00 MiB, 2 files), Codex apps/ccusage/test/fixtures/codex (0.00 MiB, 1 files)
Base runs the published ccusage package from pkg.pr.new, installed before measurement; PR runs the published ccusage package from pkg.pr.new, installed before measurement. Both run --offline --json, measured by hyperfine with 2 warmups and 7 runs.
Peak RSS is measured separately with /usr/bin/time using 1 runs. Lower RSS ratios are better.

Command Input Base median PR median PR vs base Base peak RSS PR peak RSS PR/base RSS Base throughput PR throughput
claude daily --offline --json 0.00 MiB 46.2ms 43.7ms 1.06x 56.75 MiB 57.25 MiB 1.01x 0.03 MiB/s 0.04 MiB/s
claude session --offline --json 0.00 MiB 40.3ms 42.5ms 0.95x 56.75 MiB 57.00 MiB 1.00x 0.04 MiB/s 0.04 MiB/s
codex daily --offline --json 0.00 MiB 47.7ms 40.2ms 1.19x 57.00 MiB 56.75 MiB 1.00x 0.02 MiB/s 0.02 MiB/s
codex session --offline --json 0.00 MiB 42.3ms 42.0ms 1.01x 56.75 MiB 57.00 MiB 1.00x 0.02 MiB/s 0.02 MiB/s

Large real-world-shaped fixture performance

Generated fixtures shaped from aggregate local log statistics: thousands of JSONL files, many small sessions, and a long tail of larger sessions. No real prompts, paths, or outputs are stored in the fixtures.

Fixtures: Claude /home/runner/_work/_temp/ccusage-large-fixture (1.01 GiB, 2597 files), Codex /home/runner/_work/_temp/ccusage-large-codex-fixture (1.01 GiB, 2597 files)
Base runs the published ccusage package from pkg.pr.new, installed before measurement; PR runs the published ccusage package from pkg.pr.new, installed before measurement. Both run --offline --json, measured by hyperfine with 0 warmups and 1 runs.
Peak RSS is measured separately with /usr/bin/time using 1 runs. Lower RSS ratios are better.

Command Input Base median PR median PR vs base Base peak RSS PR peak RSS PR/base RSS Base throughput PR throughput
claude --offline --json 1.01 GiB 404.7ms 396.2ms 1.02x 929.10 MiB 951.10 MiB 1.02x 2.49 GiB/s 2.54 GiB/s
codex --offline --json 1.01 GiB 159.2ms 160.4ms 0.99x 483.43 MiB 507.43 MiB 1.05x 6.32 GiB/s 6.28 GiB/s

Artifact size

Artifact Base PR Delta Ratio
packed ccusage-*.tgz 24.03 KiB 24.03 KiB +0.00 KiB 1.00x
installed native package binary 4796.16 KiB 4796.16 KiB +0.00 KiB 1.00x

Lower medians and smaller artifacts are better. CI runner noise still applies; use same-run ratios as directional PR feedback, not release guarantees.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ccusage performance comparison

PR SHA: 3e190bda5a19
Base SHA: b95a18635a01

This compares the Rust PR release binary against the configured base package on the same CI runner.

Package runtime diagnostics

Compares the PR package wrapper, the installed native optional dependency binary, and the workspace release binary on the same large fixture. This identifies whether slow package results come from JavaScript wrapper overhead, the published native binary build, or the Rust core itself.

Fixtures: Claude /home/runner/_work/_temp/ccusage-large-fixture (1.01 GiB, 2597 files), Codex /home/runner/_work/_temp/ccusage-large-codex-fixture (1.01 GiB, 2597 files)
All rows run --offline --json, measured by hyperfine with 0 warmups and 1 runs. This isolates wrapper overhead from the installed native optional dependency and the workspace release binary built on the runner.

Command Runtime Input Median Throughput Samples
claude --offline --json Package wrapper 1.01 GiB 487.0ms 2.07 GiB/s 1
claude --offline --json Installed native binary 1.01 GiB 419.3ms 2.40 GiB/s 1
codex --offline --json Package wrapper 1.01 GiB 177.4ms 5.67 GiB/s 1
codex --offline --json Installed native binary 1.01 GiB 145.2ms 6.93 GiB/s 1

Committed fixture performance

Committed small fixtures for stable PR-to-PR feedback and explicit Claude/Codex command coverage.

Fixtures: Claude apps/ccusage/test/fixtures/claude (0.00 MiB, 2 files), Codex apps/ccusage/test/fixtures/codex (0.00 MiB, 1 files)
Base runs the published ccusage package from pkg.pr.new, installed before measurement; PR runs the published native ccusage binary from pkg.pr.new, installed before measurement. Both run --offline --json, measured by hyperfine with 2 warmups and 7 runs.
Peak RSS is measured separately with /usr/bin/time using 1 runs. Lower RSS ratios are better.

Command Input Base median PR median PR vs base Base peak RSS PR peak RSS PR/base RSS Base throughput PR throughput
claude daily --offline --json 0.00 MiB 51.3ms 16.9ms 3.04x 57.25 MiB 22.97 MiB 0.40x 0.03 MiB/s 0.09 MiB/s
claude session --offline --json 0.00 MiB 40.6ms 13.4ms 3.02x 57.00 MiB 22.96 MiB 0.40x 0.04 MiB/s 0.12 MiB/s
codex daily --offline --json 0.00 MiB 44.0ms 16.5ms 2.67x 57.25 MiB 26.97 MiB 0.47x 0.02 MiB/s 0.05 MiB/s
codex session --offline --json 0.00 MiB 47.3ms 15.2ms 3.11x 57.25 MiB 26.96 MiB 0.47x 0.02 MiB/s 0.06 MiB/s

Large real-world-shaped fixture performance

Generated fixtures shaped from aggregate local log statistics: thousands of JSONL files, many small sessions, and a long tail of larger sessions. No real prompts, paths, or outputs are stored in the fixtures.

Fixtures: Claude /home/runner/_work/_temp/ccusage-large-fixture (1.01 GiB, 2597 files), Codex /home/runner/_work/_temp/ccusage-large-codex-fixture (1.01 GiB, 2597 files)
Base runs the published ccusage package from pkg.pr.new, installed before measurement; PR runs the published native ccusage binary from pkg.pr.new, installed before measurement. Both run --offline --json, measured by hyperfine with 0 warmups and 1 runs.
Peak RSS is measured separately with /usr/bin/time using 1 runs. Lower RSS ratios are better.

Command Input Base median PR median PR vs base Base peak RSS PR peak RSS PR/base RSS Base throughput PR throughput
claude --offline --json 1.01 GiB 457.2ms 396.3ms 1.15x 910.84 MiB 927.10 MiB 1.02x 2.20 GiB/s 2.54 GiB/s
codex --offline --json 1.01 GiB 191.1ms 154.7ms 1.24x 487.43 MiB 495.43 MiB 1.02x 5.27 GiB/s 6.51 GiB/s

Artifact size

Artifact Base PR Delta Ratio
packed ccusage-*.tgz 24.03 KiB 24.03 KiB +0.00 KiB 1.00x
installed native package binary 4796.16 KiB 4796.16 KiB +0.00 KiB 1.00x

Lower medians and smaller artifacts are better. CI runner noise still applies; use same-run ratios as directional PR feedback, not release guarantees.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant