You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
feat: support zcode (智谱 AI coding CLI) as a data source #1382
Users in China increasingly use 智谱 AI models through the zcode CLI. Tracking token usage and costs across both Claude Code and zcode in one tool would be very valuable.
This issue was auto-closed. Issues from new contributors are auto-closed by default.
Maintainers review auto-closed issues and reopen worthwhile ones. Issues that do not meet the quality bar in CONTRIBUTING.md may not be reopened or receive a reply.
Keep the issue short, concrete, and written in your own voice.
If a maintainer replies lgtmi, your future issues will stay open. If a maintainer replies lgtm, your future issues and PRs will stay open.
Historical audit: this discussion was auto-closed by the legacy contributor gate. That closure did not assess technical importance.
Audit result: resolved. A later merged change or the current main implementation covers this request. This item is kept for history and does not need to be reopened.
Activity
pullfrog commentedon Jun 29, 2026
github-actions commentedon Jun 29, 2026
This issue was auto-closed. Issues from new contributors are auto-closed by default.
Maintainers review auto-closed issues and reopen worthwhile ones. Issues that do not meet the quality bar in CONTRIBUTING.md may not be reopened or receive a reply.
Keep the issue short, concrete, and written in your own voice.
If a maintainer replies
lgtmi, your future issues will stay open. If a maintainer replieslgtm, your future issues and PRs will stay open.See CONTRIBUTING.md.
axisrow commentedon Aug 11, 2026
+1 — I'd also like zcode support. I use zcode (智谱 AI) alongside Claude Code and Codex, and tracking all three in one report would be very useful.
axisrow commentedon Aug 31, 2026
@lengmodkx git pull #1675
ryoppippi commentedon Aug 31, 2026
Historical audit: this discussion was auto-closed by the legacy contributor gate. That closure did not assess technical importance.
Audit result: resolved. A later merged change or the current
mainimplementation covers this request. This item is kept for history and does not need to be reopened.