You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
workshop health gate blocks recovery commands (remove/stop/list) when the storage pool is full #963
Environment: workshop 0.9.4 (rev 386, latest/stable), LXD 6.9 (rev 39858), ZFS pool workshop at /var/snap/lxd/common/lxd/disks/workshop.img.
Summary: When the workshop ZFS pool crosses the fullness threshold (observed at 92%, 2.4 GiB free), the health check rejects every subcommand — including the ones needed to recover:
error: system is not healthy: storage pool "workshop" is 92% full (2.4 GiB available);
free up space or expand the pool with `lxc storage volume set workshop size=<N>GiB`
workshop remove, workshop stop, and even read-only workshop list/info all abort with this before doing anything. The only way out (other than expanding the storage volume I guess) is dropping to raw lxc delete ... --project workshop.<uid> --force, which bypasses workshop's bookkeeping and risks orphaning shared clone-parent snapshots.
Expected: cleanup/recovery commands (remove, stop) and read-only commands (list, info) should be exempt from the fullness gate — or it should warn rather than hard-block for them — so a full pool is recoverable with workshop itself.
Actual: all subcommands hard-fail; recovery requires raw lxc.
It's counterintuitive but workshop remove, at least, can fail if there's not enough space. There's not much we can do about it without changing how LXD works.
It's likely we could enable list and info, but we plan on making storage management a first class feature so we'll probably tackle it then.
Activity
jonathan-conder commentedon Jul 26, 2026
It's counterintuitive but
workshop remove, at least, can fail if there's not enough space. There's not much we can do about it without changing how LXD works.It's likely we could enable
listandinfo, but we plan on making storage management a first class feature so we'll probably tackle it then.