Skip to content

ci: ignore unstable chisel releases - #683

Merged
cjdcordeiro merged 5 commits into
canonical:mainfrom
lczyk:ROCKS-2504/add-ignore-unstable-mini
Oct 2, 2025
Merged

cjdcordeiro merged 5 commits into
canonical:mainfrom
lczyk:ROCKS-2504/add-ignore-unstable-mini

Conversation

@lczyk

@lczyk lczyk commented Sep 30, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Proposed changes

mini version of #676

Related issues/PRs

#676

Forward porting

n/a

Checklist

@lczyk lczyk changed the title ci:ignore unstable chisel releases ci: ignore unstable chisel releases Sep 30, 2025
@lczyk
lczyk requested a review from cjdcordeiro September 30, 2025 14:48
@lczyk lczyk self-assigned this Sep 30, 2025
@lczyk
lczyk force-pushed the ROCKS-2504/add-ignore-unstable-mini branch from 4b3bf87 to d060ddd Compare September 30, 2025 16:03
@ROCKsBot
ROCKsBot requested a review from a team October 1, 2025 01:36
@lczyk
lczyk requested a review from cjdcordeiro October 1, 2025 12:51
@cjdcordeiro

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@lczyk do you confirm that these error are related with your ongoing work to bring 25.10 to an healthy state?

logging.info("No slices will be installed.")
return

extra_flag = '--ignore=unstable' if subprocess.check_output(["chisel","version"]).strip().decode().lstrip("v") > "1.2.0" else ''

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wouldn't this affect a 1.2.1 release as well?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, but there isn't one, and the "--ignore" code is already in main, so whatever the next version is, it will already support this flag

@lczyk

lczyk commented Oct 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@lczyk do you confirm that these error are related with your ongoing work to bring 25.10 to an healthy state?

yep. the fact that it got to the installation means that the bit that this is trying to fix is working

@lczyk lczyk mentioned this pull request Oct 1, 2025
3 tasks done
@ROCKsBot
ROCKsBot requested a review from a team October 2, 2025 01:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants