Skip to content

test(26.04): add set -eu to binutils tests - #1090

Merged
lczyk merged 1 commit into
canonical:ubuntu-26.04from
alesancor1:fix/26.04-binutils-tests
Jul 24, 2026
Merged

lczyk merged 1 commit into
canonical:ubuntu-26.04from
alesancor1:fix/26.04-binutils-tests

Conversation

@alesancor1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Proposed changes

Add set -eu to binutils tests. See #1079 (comment)

Related issues/PRs

Forward porting

n/a

Checklist

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Diff of dependencies:
None found.


@alesancor1
alesancor1 marked this pull request as ready for review July 23, 2026 16:54
@alesancor1
alesancor1 requested a review from lczyk July 23, 2026 16:54
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test Coverage

Average Total Coverage: 0%


Arch: aarch64

Coverage: 0.00%


Arch: ppc64le

Coverage: 0.00%


Arch: s390x

Coverage: 0.00%


Arch: x86_64

Coverage: 0.00%

@alesancor1
alesancor1 requested review from lczyk and zhijie-yang and removed request for lczyk July 23, 2026 16:54
@lczyk

lczyk commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

merging with one approve as port of #1079 + it also only touches tests, not slices

@lczyk
lczyk merged commit 72f92b5 into canonical:ubuntu-26.04 Jul 24, 2026
46 of 50 checks passed
@alesancor1
alesancor1 deleted the fix/26.04-binutils-tests branch July 24, 2026 12:45
@lczyk lczyk mentioned this pull request Jul 27, 2026
3 tasks done
lczyk added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2026
* fix(26.04): dangling cpp-15 copyright on cross arches

The /usr/share/doc entry of a cpp-15-<triplet> package is a symlink whose
target depends on how that package was built: gcc-15-base for the native
build, gcc-15-<triplet>-base for the cross builds. Pulling gcc-15-base
unconditionally left the symlink dangling everywhere but on the native
architecture.

The four gcc-15-<triplet>-base packages get copyright slices of their own.
The two comments claiming the symlink always points at gcc-15-base are
reworded, and the same marker is added to the two sibling entries that
were missing it.

The gcc-15-<triplet> slices have the same bug and are fixed on top of this
branch, since they need the base slices added here.

Fixes #1050 for 26.04.

* test(26.04): fix dynamic linker lookup in the cpp-15 tests

The ld-linux-*.so.* glob matches nothing on ppc64el and s390x, whose
loaders are ld64.so.2 and ld64.so.1. Use the same lookup #1090 gave the
binutils tests and the cpp-15 s390x and ppc64le tests already use, so all
four cpp-15 suites agree.

Nothing was failing: the value is only consumed on the native-architecture
path, which never ran on those two runners.

* fix(26.04): dangling gcc-15 copyright on cross arches

Same bug and same fix as the cpp-15 slices this branch builds on: the
/usr/share/doc entry of a gcc-15-<triplet> package is a symlink to
gcc-15-base for the native build and to gcc-15-<triplet>-base for the
cross builds, so pulling gcc-15-base unconditionally left it dangling
everywhere but on the native architecture.

Depends on the gcc-15-<triplet>-base slices added by the cpp-15 branch.
lczyk added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2026
* fix(26.04): dangling cpp-15 copyright on cross arches

The /usr/share/doc entry of a cpp-15-<triplet> package is a symlink whose
target depends on how that package was built: gcc-15-base for the native
build, gcc-15-<triplet>-base for the cross builds. Pulling gcc-15-base
unconditionally left the symlink dangling everywhere but on the native
architecture.

The four gcc-15-<triplet>-base packages get copyright slices of their own.
The two comments claiming the symlink always points at gcc-15-base are
reworded, and the same marker is added to the two sibling entries that
were missing it.

The gcc-15-<triplet> slices have the same bug and are fixed on top of this
branch, since they need the base slices added here.

Fixes #1050 for 26.04.

* test(26.04): fix dynamic linker lookup in the cpp-15 tests

The ld-linux-*.so.* glob matches nothing on ppc64el and s390x, whose
loaders are ld64.so.2 and ld64.so.1. Use the same lookup #1090 gave the
binutils tests and the cpp-15 s390x and ppc64le tests already use, so all
four cpp-15 suites agree.

Nothing was failing: the value is only consumed on the native-architecture
path, which never ran on those two runners.
lczyk added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2026
* fix(26.04): dangling cpp-15 copyright on cross arches

The /usr/share/doc entry of a cpp-15-<triplet> package is a symlink whose
target depends on how that package was built: gcc-15-base for the native
build, gcc-15-<triplet>-base for the cross builds. Pulling gcc-15-base
unconditionally left the symlink dangling everywhere but on the native
architecture.

The four gcc-15-<triplet>-base packages get copyright slices of their own.
The two comments claiming the symlink always points at gcc-15-base are
reworded, and the same marker is added to the two sibling entries that
were missing it.

The gcc-15-<triplet> slices have the same bug and are fixed on top of this
branch, since they need the base slices added here.

Fixes #1050 for 26.04.

* test(26.04): fix dynamic linker lookup in the cpp-15 tests

The ld-linux-*.so.* glob matches nothing on ppc64el and s390x, whose
loaders are ld64.so.2 and ld64.so.1. Use the same lookup #1090 gave the
binutils tests and the cpp-15 s390x and ppc64le tests already use, so all
four cpp-15 suites agree.

Nothing was failing: the value is only consumed on the native-architecture
path, which never ran on those two runners.
lczyk added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2026
* fix(26.04): dangling cpp-15 copyright on cross arches

The /usr/share/doc entry of a cpp-15-<triplet> package is a symlink whose
target depends on how that package was built: gcc-15-base for the native
build, gcc-15-<triplet>-base for the cross builds. Pulling gcc-15-base
unconditionally left the symlink dangling everywhere but on the native
architecture.

The four gcc-15-<triplet>-base packages get copyright slices of their own.
The two comments claiming the symlink always points at gcc-15-base are
reworded, and the same marker is added to the two sibling entries that
were missing it.

The gcc-15-<triplet> slices have the same bug and are fixed on top of this
branch, since they need the base slices added here.

Fixes #1050 for 26.04.

* test(26.04): fix dynamic linker lookup in the cpp-15 tests

The ld-linux-*.so.* glob matches nothing on ppc64el and s390x, whose
loaders are ld64.so.2 and ld64.so.1. Use the same lookup #1090 gave the
binutils tests and the cpp-15 s390x and ppc64le tests already use, so all
four cpp-15 suites agree.

Nothing was failing: the value is only consumed on the native-architecture
path, which never ran on those two runners.

* fix(26.04): dangling gcc-15 copyright on cross arches

Same bug and same fix as the cpp-15 slices this branch builds on: the
/usr/share/doc entry of a gcc-15-<triplet> package is a symlink to
gcc-15-base for the native build and to gcc-15-<triplet>-base for the
cross builds, so pulling gcc-15-base unconditionally left it dangling
everywhere but on the native architecture.

Depends on the gcc-15-<triplet>-base slices added by the cpp-15 branch.
lczyk added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2026
* feat(26.04): add cpp-13 slices for s390x and ppc64le

Forward port of #1091 from ubuntu-24.04, rewritten for chisel format v3.

The /usr/share/doc entry of a cpp-13-<triplet> package is a symlink whose
target depends on how that package was built: gcc-13-base for the native
build, gcc-13-<triplet>-base for the cross builds. The copyright slices
are keyed by architecture accordingly, and the four gcc-13-<triplet>-base
packages get copyright slices of their own.

* test(26.04): add integration tests for cpp-13 on s390x and ppc64le

The existing cpp-13 tests also learn about the two new spread runners, on
which they are cross-compilation cases.

* docs(26.04): mark cpp-13 copyright paths as symlinks

Matches the marker the binutils and cpp-15 slices carry, and makes it
clear the entry is not the directory it looks like.

* test(26.04): fix dynamic linker lookup in the cpp-13 tests

The ld-linux-*.so.* glob matches nothing on ppc64el and s390x, whose
loaders are ld64.so.2 and ld64.so.1. Use the same lookup #1090 gave the
binutils tests, so all four cpp-13 suites agree.

Nothing was failing: the value is only consumed on the native-architecture
path, which never runs on those two runners.

* fix(libc6-dev): omit absent s390x headers

The s390x libc6-dev package no longer ships gnu/lib-names-64.h or
gnu/stubs-64.h. Restrict those entries to amd64 while retaining the
generic headers, restoring s390x slice installation on Ubuntu 26.10.

---------

Co-authored-by: Zhijie Yang <[email protected]>
lczyk added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2026
* feat(26.04): add cpp-13 slices for s390x and ppc64le

Forward port of #1091 from ubuntu-24.04, rewritten for chisel format v3.

The /usr/share/doc entry of a cpp-13-<triplet> package is a symlink whose
target depends on how that package was built: gcc-13-base for the native
build, gcc-13-<triplet>-base for the cross builds. The copyright slices
are keyed by architecture accordingly, and the four gcc-13-<triplet>-base
packages get copyright slices of their own.

* test(26.04): add integration tests for cpp-13 on s390x and ppc64le

The existing cpp-13 tests also learn about the two new spread runners, on
which they are cross-compilation cases.

* docs(26.04): mark cpp-13 copyright paths as symlinks

Matches the marker the binutils and cpp-15 slices carry, and makes it
clear the entry is not the directory it looks like.

* test(26.04): fix dynamic linker lookup in the cpp-13 tests

The ld-linux-*.so.* glob matches nothing on ppc64el and s390x, whose
loaders are ld64.so.2 and ld64.so.1. Use the same lookup #1090 gave the
binutils tests, so all four cpp-13 suites agree.

Nothing was failing: the value is only consumed on the native-architecture
path, which never runs on those two runners.
lczyk added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2026
* feat(26.04): add cpp-13 slices for s390x and ppc64le

Forward port of #1091 from ubuntu-24.04, rewritten for chisel format v3.

The /usr/share/doc entry of a cpp-13-<triplet> package is a symlink whose
target depends on how that package was built: gcc-13-base for the native
build, gcc-13-<triplet>-base for the cross builds. The copyright slices
are keyed by architecture accordingly, and the four gcc-13-<triplet>-base
packages get copyright slices of their own.

* test(26.04): add integration tests for cpp-13 on s390x and ppc64le

The existing cpp-13 tests also learn about the two new spread runners, on
which they are cross-compilation cases.

* docs(26.04): mark cpp-13 copyright paths as symlinks

Matches the marker the binutils and cpp-15 slices carry, and makes it
clear the entry is not the directory it looks like.

* test(26.04): fix dynamic linker lookup in the cpp-13 tests

The ld-linux-*.so.* glob matches nothing on ppc64el and s390x, whose
loaders are ld64.so.2 and ld64.so.1. Use the same lookup #1090 gave the
binutils tests, so all four cpp-13 suites agree.

Nothing was failing: the value is only consumed on the native-architecture
path, which never runs on those two runners.

* fix(26.04): dangling gcc-13 copyright on cross arches

Same bug and same fix as the cpp-13 slices this branch builds on: the
/usr/share/doc entry of a gcc-13-<triplet> package is a symlink to
gcc-13-base for the native build and to gcc-13-<triplet>-base for the
cross builds, so pulling gcc-13-base unconditionally left it dangling
everywhere but on the native architecture.

Depends on the gcc-13-<triplet>-base slices added by the cpp-13 branch.

* test(26.04): run the gcc-13 tests on the s390x and ppc64le runners

Both suites bailed out with "Unsupported architecture" there, which fails
outright now that a change to these slices schedules them on all four
runners. The arch lists match what gcc-15 already carries.

* docs(26.04): align the gcc-13 slice notes with gcc-15

Three generations of these slices each spelled the same guidance
differently. Adopt the wording gcc-15 carries.

* feat(26.04): add gcc-13 slices for s390x and ppc64le

Forward port of the remaining half of #1092. The two new triplet slices
follow gcc-15's, including the per-architecture copyright split the rest of
this branch applies to the existing two.

gcc-13.yaml gains the matching cc1 and gcc-13 entries, so gcc-13_gcc-13 --
the architecture-independent slice that carries /usr/bin/gcc-13 along with
an assembler, a linker and cc1 -- resolves on all four architectures rather
than only amd64 and arm64.

* test(26.04): add integration tests for gcc-13 on s390x and ppc64le

Copies of the gcc-15 suites, which already cover these two runners.

* test(26.04): drop the chisel_arch workaround from the gcc-13 test

Obsolete since canonical/chisel#256, and its Unsupported architecture
fallback fails outright on the s390x and ppc64le runners -- which a change
to gcc-13.yaml now schedules. Same shape the gcc-15 test already has.
lczyk added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2026
* feat(26.04): add cpp-13 slices for s390x and ppc64le

Forward port of #1091 from ubuntu-24.04, rewritten for chisel format v3.

The /usr/share/doc entry of a cpp-13-<triplet> package is a symlink whose
target depends on how that package was built: gcc-13-base for the native
build, gcc-13-<triplet>-base for the cross builds. The copyright slices
are keyed by architecture accordingly, and the four gcc-13-<triplet>-base
packages get copyright slices of their own.

* test(26.04): add integration tests for cpp-13 on s390x and ppc64le

The existing cpp-13 tests also learn about the two new spread runners, on
which they are cross-compilation cases.

* docs(26.04): mark cpp-13 copyright paths as symlinks

Matches the marker the binutils and cpp-15 slices carry, and makes it
clear the entry is not the directory it looks like.

* test(26.04): fix dynamic linker lookup in the cpp-13 tests

The ld-linux-*.so.* glob matches nothing on ppc64el and s390x, whose
loaders are ld64.so.2 and ld64.so.1. Use the same lookup #1090 gave the
binutils tests, so all four cpp-13 suites agree.

Nothing was failing: the value is only consumed on the native-architecture
path, which never runs on those two runners.

* fix(26.04): dangling gcc-13 copyright on cross arches

Same bug and same fix as the cpp-13 slices this branch builds on: the
/usr/share/doc entry of a gcc-13-<triplet> package is a symlink to
gcc-13-base for the native build and to gcc-13-<triplet>-base for the
cross builds, so pulling gcc-13-base unconditionally left it dangling
everywhere but on the native architecture.

Depends on the gcc-13-<triplet>-base slices added by the cpp-13 branch.

* test(26.04): run the gcc-13 tests on the s390x and ppc64le runners

Both suites bailed out with "Unsupported architecture" there, which fails
outright now that a change to these slices schedules them on all four
runners. The arch lists match what gcc-15 already carries.

* docs(26.04): align the gcc-13 slice notes with gcc-15

Three generations of these slices each spelled the same guidance
differently. Adopt the wording gcc-15 carries.

* feat(26.04): add gcc-13 slices for s390x and ppc64le

Forward port of the remaining half of #1092. The two new triplet slices
follow gcc-15's, including the per-architecture copyright split the rest of
this branch applies to the existing two.

gcc-13.yaml gains the matching cc1 and gcc-13 entries, so gcc-13_gcc-13 --
the architecture-independent slice that carries /usr/bin/gcc-13 along with
an assembler, a linker and cc1 -- resolves on all four architectures rather
than only amd64 and arm64.

* test(26.04): add integration tests for gcc-13 on s390x and ppc64le

Copies of the gcc-15 suites, which already cover these two runners.

* test(26.04): drop the chisel_arch workaround from the gcc-13 test

Obsolete since canonical/chisel#256, and its Unsupported architecture
fallback fails outright on the s390x and ppc64le runners -- which a change
to gcc-13.yaml now schedules. Same shape the gcc-15 test already has.
lczyk added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2026
* feat(26.04): add cpp-14 slices for s390x and ppc64le

Same shape as the cpp-13 slices, one toolchain generation up.

The /usr/share/doc entry of a cpp-14-<triplet> package is a symlink whose
target depends on how that package was built: gcc-14-base for the native
build, gcc-14-<triplet>-base for the cross builds. The copyright slices
are keyed by architecture accordingly, and the four gcc-14-<triplet>-base
packages get copyright slices of their own.

* test(26.04): add integration tests for cpp-14 on s390x and ppc64le

The existing cpp-14 tests also learn about the two new spread runners, on
which they are cross-compilation cases.

* docs(26.04): mark cpp-14 copyright paths as symlinks

Matches the marker the binutils and cpp-15 slices carry, and makes it
clear the entry is not the directory it looks like.

* test(26.04): fix dynamic linker lookup in the cpp-14 tests

The ld-linux-*.so.* glob matches nothing on ppc64el and s390x, whose
loaders are ld64.so.2 and ld64.so.1. Use the same lookup #1090 gave the
binutils tests, so all four cpp-14 suites agree.

Nothing was failing: the value is only consumed on the native-architecture
path, which never runs on those two runners.

* fix(libc6-dev): omit absent s390x headers

The s390x libc6-dev package no longer ships gnu/lib-names-64.h or
gnu/stubs-64.h. Restrict those entries to amd64 while retaining the
generic headers, restoring s390x slice installation on Ubuntu 26.10.

---------

Co-authored-by: Zhijie Yang <[email protected]>
lczyk added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2026
* feat(26.04): add cpp-14 slices for s390x and ppc64le

Same shape as the cpp-13 slices, one toolchain generation up.

The /usr/share/doc entry of a cpp-14-<triplet> package is a symlink whose
target depends on how that package was built: gcc-14-base for the native
build, gcc-14-<triplet>-base for the cross builds. The copyright slices
are keyed by architecture accordingly, and the four gcc-14-<triplet>-base
packages get copyright slices of their own.

* test(26.04): add integration tests for cpp-14 on s390x and ppc64le

The existing cpp-14 tests also learn about the two new spread runners, on
which they are cross-compilation cases.

* docs(26.04): mark cpp-14 copyright paths as symlinks

Matches the marker the binutils and cpp-15 slices carry, and makes it
clear the entry is not the directory it looks like.

* test(26.04): fix dynamic linker lookup in the cpp-14 tests

The ld-linux-*.so.* glob matches nothing on ppc64el and s390x, whose
loaders are ld64.so.2 and ld64.so.1. Use the same lookup #1090 gave the
binutils tests, so all four cpp-14 suites agree.

Nothing was failing: the value is only consumed on the native-architecture
path, which never runs on those two runners.
lczyk added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2026
* feat(26.04): add cpp-14 slices for s390x and ppc64le

Same shape as the cpp-13 slices, one toolchain generation up.

The /usr/share/doc entry of a cpp-14-<triplet> package is a symlink whose
target depends on how that package was built: gcc-14-base for the native
build, gcc-14-<triplet>-base for the cross builds. The copyright slices
are keyed by architecture accordingly, and the four gcc-14-<triplet>-base
packages get copyright slices of their own.

* test(26.04): add integration tests for cpp-14 on s390x and ppc64le

The existing cpp-14 tests also learn about the two new spread runners, on
which they are cross-compilation cases.

* docs(26.04): mark cpp-14 copyright paths as symlinks

Matches the marker the binutils and cpp-15 slices carry, and makes it
clear the entry is not the directory it looks like.

* test(26.04): fix dynamic linker lookup in the cpp-14 tests

The ld-linux-*.so.* glob matches nothing on ppc64el and s390x, whose
loaders are ld64.so.2 and ld64.so.1. Use the same lookup #1090 gave the
binutils tests, so all four cpp-14 suites agree.

Nothing was failing: the value is only consumed on the native-architecture
path, which never runs on those two runners.

* fix(26.04): dangling gcc-14 copyright on cross arches

Same bug and same fix as the cpp-14 slices this branch builds on: the
/usr/share/doc entry of a gcc-14-<triplet> package is a symlink to
gcc-14-base for the native build and to gcc-14-<triplet>-base for the
cross builds, so pulling gcc-14-base unconditionally left it dangling
everywhere but on the native architecture.

Depends on the gcc-14-<triplet>-base slices added by the cpp-14 branch.

* test(26.04): run the gcc-14 tests on the s390x and ppc64le runners

Both suites bailed out with "Unsupported architecture" there, which fails
outright now that a change to these slices schedules them on all four
runners. The arch lists match what gcc-15 already carries.

* docs(26.04): correct and align the gcc-14 slice notes

The notes pointed at cpp-12-<triplet> for the cc1 compiler, two
generations off. They also carried a TODO saying the architecture-
independent gcc-14 slices do not exist yet, which slices/gcc-14.yaml has
since made untrue.

Replaced with the wording gcc-15 already carries, so the three generations
read the same.

* feat(26.04): add gcc-14 slices for s390x and ppc64le

The two new triplet slices follow gcc-15's, including the per-architecture
copyright split the rest of this branch applies to the existing two. Noble
has no gcc-14, so there is nothing to forward port from -- this is #1092
applied to a generation that release never carried.

gcc-14.yaml gains the matching cc1 and gcc-14 entries, so gcc-14_gcc-14 --
the architecture-independent slice that carries /usr/bin/gcc-14 along with
an assembler, a linker and cc1 -- resolves on all four architectures rather
than only amd64 and arm64.

* test(26.04): add integration tests for gcc-14 on s390x and ppc64le

Copies of the gcc-15 suites, which already cover these two runners.

* test(26.04): drop the chisel_arch workaround from the gcc-14 test

Obsolete since canonical/chisel#256, and its Unsupported architecture
fallback fails outright on the s390x and ppc64le runners -- which a change
to gcc-14.yaml now schedules. Same shape the gcc-15 test already has.
lczyk added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2026
* feat(26.04): add cpp-14 slices for s390x and ppc64le

Same shape as the cpp-13 slices, one toolchain generation up.

The /usr/share/doc entry of a cpp-14-<triplet> package is a symlink whose
target depends on how that package was built: gcc-14-base for the native
build, gcc-14-<triplet>-base for the cross builds. The copyright slices
are keyed by architecture accordingly, and the four gcc-14-<triplet>-base
packages get copyright slices of their own.

* test(26.04): add integration tests for cpp-14 on s390x and ppc64le

The existing cpp-14 tests also learn about the two new spread runners, on
which they are cross-compilation cases.

* docs(26.04): mark cpp-14 copyright paths as symlinks

Matches the marker the binutils and cpp-15 slices carry, and makes it
clear the entry is not the directory it looks like.

* test(26.04): fix dynamic linker lookup in the cpp-14 tests

The ld-linux-*.so.* glob matches nothing on ppc64el and s390x, whose
loaders are ld64.so.2 and ld64.so.1. Use the same lookup #1090 gave the
binutils tests, so all four cpp-14 suites agree.

Nothing was failing: the value is only consumed on the native-architecture
path, which never runs on those two runners.

* fix(26.04): dangling gcc-14 copyright on cross arches

Same bug and same fix as the cpp-14 slices this branch builds on: the
/usr/share/doc entry of a gcc-14-<triplet> package is a symlink to
gcc-14-base for the native build and to gcc-14-<triplet>-base for the
cross builds, so pulling gcc-14-base unconditionally left it dangling
everywhere but on the native architecture.

Depends on the gcc-14-<triplet>-base slices added by the cpp-14 branch.

* test(26.04): run the gcc-14 tests on the s390x and ppc64le runners

Both suites bailed out with "Unsupported architecture" there, which fails
outright now that a change to these slices schedules them on all four
runners. The arch lists match what gcc-15 already carries.

* docs(26.04): correct and align the gcc-14 slice notes

The notes pointed at cpp-12-<triplet> for the cc1 compiler, two
generations off. They also carried a TODO saying the architecture-
independent gcc-14 slices do not exist yet, which slices/gcc-14.yaml has
since made untrue.

Replaced with the wording gcc-15 already carries, so the three generations
read the same.

* feat(26.04): add gcc-14 slices for s390x and ppc64le

The two new triplet slices follow gcc-15's, including the per-architecture
copyright split the rest of this branch applies to the existing two. Noble
has no gcc-14, so there is nothing to forward port from -- this is #1092
applied to a generation that release never carried.

gcc-14.yaml gains the matching cc1 and gcc-14 entries, so gcc-14_gcc-14 --
the architecture-independent slice that carries /usr/bin/gcc-14 along with
an assembler, a linker and cc1 -- resolves on all four architectures rather
than only amd64 and arm64.

* test(26.04): add integration tests for gcc-14 on s390x and ppc64le

Copies of the gcc-15 suites, which already cover these two runners.

* test(26.04): drop the chisel_arch workaround from the gcc-14 test

Obsolete since canonical/chisel#256, and its Unsupported architecture
fallback fails outright on the s390x and ppc64le runners -- which a change
to gcc-14.yaml now schedules. Same shape the gcc-15 test already has.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants