Problem Description:
The current error formatting structure in the camera project diverges from the established standards of OpenID/OAuth 2.0. Although it includes fields like status, code, and message, as outlined in the provided ErrorInfo, it lacks key components such as error, error_description, and optionally error_uri, which are vital for effective error handling according to OpenID/OAuth 2.0 standards.

Here is the existing ErrorInfo structure:

ErrorInfo:
  type: object
  required:
    - status
    - code
    - message
  properties:
    status:
      type: integer
      description: HTTP response status code
    code:
      type: string
      description: Code given to this error
    message:
      type: string
      description: Detailed error description

Expected Behavior:
To ensure compliance with OpenID/OAuth 2.0 standards, the error formatting for the camera project should include the following fields:

• error: Represents the error code or identifier.
• error_description (optional): Provides a human-readable explanation of the error.
• error_uri (optional): Includes a URI that offers additional information about the error.

Alternative Solution:
Alternatively, to align with OpenID/OAuth 2.0 standards, the camera project's error formatting can be updated as follows:

error:
  type: object
  required:
    - error
    - error_description
  properties:
    error:
      type: string
      description: Error code or identifier.
    error_description:
      type: string
      description: Optional human-readable description of the error.
    error_uri:
      type: string
      description: Optional URI providing additional information about the error.

Additional Context:
These suggested modifications closely adhere to the specifications outlined in the OpenID/OAuth 2.0 standard. For further clarity, please refer to the documentation provided in RFC 6749 - The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework, Section 4.1.2.1.