Add Strategy::Winch and RegallocAlgorithm support to the C and C++ API#13155
Merged
Conversation
lethalbit
force-pushed
the
aki/wasmtime-c
branch
from
6a341f7 to
7734f17
Compare
lethalbit
changed the title
Strategy::Winch and RegallocAlgorithm support to the C an C++ APIStrategy::Winch and RegallocAlgorithm support to the C and C++ API
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi all!
This is a very small PR that just ensures that
Strategy::Winchhas been added to the C and C++ side of things.It also adds support for setting
cranelift_regalloc_algorithm, via the C and C++ APIs so it adds the needed bits for that (that being support for setting it via the C and C++ APIs and the new enum defs on that side of the FFI fence)I did give a quick canvas around and didn't find anything super directly related to these changes in the existing PR list, but I could have missed something!