Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Winch: Add implementations for pmin and pmax for x64 with AVX #10284

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 25, 2025

Conversation

jeffcharles
Copy link
Contributor

Part of #8093. Implements the following instructions:

  • f32x4.pmin
  • f64x2.pmin
  • f32x4.pmax
  • f64x2.pmax

@jeffcharles jeffcharles requested review from a team as code owners February 24, 2025 20:30
@jeffcharles jeffcharles requested review from cfallin and alexcrichton and removed request for a team February 24, 2025 20:30
@alexcrichton alexcrichton requested review from saulecabrera and removed request for alexcrichton February 24, 2025 20:48
@github-actions github-actions bot added the winch Winch issues or pull requests label Feb 24, 2025
Copy link

Subscribe to Label Action

cc @saulecabrera

This issue or pull request has been labeled: "winch"

Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:

  • saulecabrera: winch

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the .github/subscribe-to-label.json configuration file.

Learn more.

@saulecabrera saulecabrera added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 25, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a conflict with the base branch Feb 25, 2025
@alexcrichton alexcrichton added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 25, 2025
Merged via the queue into bytecodealliance:main with commit b0319eb Feb 25, 2025
39 checks passed
@jeffcharles jeffcharles deleted the winch-simd-pmin-pmax branch February 25, 2025 16:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
winch Winch issues or pull requests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants