Skip to content

Match record fields within complex types in ast.Search filter#1516

Merged
nwt merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
record-fields-within-complex-types-search
Oct 20, 2020
Merged

Match record fields within complex types in ast.Search filter#1516
nwt merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
record-fields-within-complex-types-search

Conversation

@nwt
Copy link
Member

@nwt nwt commented Oct 17, 2020

Depends on #1515.

Closes #1223.

@nwt nwt requested a review from a team October 17, 2020 22:29
Base automatically changed from sets-with-complex-element to master October 20, 2020 16:15
@nwt nwt force-pushed the record-fields-within-complex-types-search branch from 3325637 to 2570661 Compare October 20, 2020 16:16
@nwt nwt merged commit 4234268 into master Oct 20, 2020
@nwt nwt deleted the record-fields-within-complex-types-search branch October 20, 2020 20:52
brim-bot pushed a commit to brimdata/zui that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2020
…arch filter" by nwt

This is an auto-generated commit with a zq dependency update. The zq PR
brimdata/super#1516, authored by @nwt,
has been merged.

Match record fields within complex types in ast.Search filter

Depends on brimdata/super#1515.

Closes brimdata/super#1223.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Search doesn't search records inside arrays

2 participants