-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 174
Closed
Labels
staleThere has been no additional replies or questions and the thread is assumed closedThere has been no additional replies or questions and the thread is assumed closed
Description
I found myself going through convolutions to document the fact that the sortBy model contains a field for the custom comparer function. I understand moving the definition of the custom compare from being a global property on the table to something that is (or can be) field-specific. But why can't we put that on the field definition rather than the sortBy definition? Then we wouldn't have the wipe-out problem and I think the dev experience for single sort would be cleaner
Originally posted by @dwgray in #2596 (comment)
jagjeet-ccl and a-kriya
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
staleThere has been no additional replies or questions and the thread is assumed closedThere has been no additional replies or questions and the thread is assumed closed