Skip to content

fix(relay): keep 413 for ref-snapshot limits and run git publish tests in CI - #9429

Merged
jmecom merged 1 commit into
jm/git-formal-assurancefrom
git-publish-ci-fix
Nov 13, 2026
Merged

jmecom merged 1 commit into
jm/git-formal-assurancefrom
git-publish-ci-fix

Conversation

@brow

@brow brow commented Nov 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Fixes three problems on #9425 found in review. Targets jm/git-formal-assurance.

  • The new tests never ran in CI. just test-unit selected neither api::git::cas_publish::tests nor api::git::transport::track_c_tests. Both modules are now in the infra-free buzz-relay filter, and in its scripts/run-tests.sh fallback. Their #[ignore]d Postgres/MinIO cases are not selected by this lane.
  • Ref-snapshot resource limits became 500. Moving the snapshot into observe_push sent its CasError::ResourceLimit (4 MiB snapshot, manifest ref cap) through a catch-all 500 arm. It returns 413 repository exceeds relay resource limits again, as the publish path did before; other errors stay 500. snapshot_resource_limit_answers_413 pins it through finalize_push (infra-free).
  • Doc overclaim. docs/git-on-object-storage.md now says a successful write rules out intervening writes that changed the pointer; the Lean model omits the default-branch setter, whose same-value write rewrites the same body.

Validation: the two added filter clauses select 45 tests, which pass locally with no DATABASE_URL. CI should show push_disposition_publishes_only_changed_refs_from_a_clean_exit, ref_snapshot_rejects_every_line_it_cannot_read push_is_published_exactly_when_receive_pack_changed_refs and snapshot_resource_limit_answers_413 in the Rust / Unit Tests log.

Rebased onto the current jm/git-formal-assurance, which already gates the push fixture to unix and makes the refused-ref case independent of git version. All 45 selected tests pass locally on git 2.56.0.

@jmecom
jmecom force-pushed the jm/git-formal-assurance branch from 8700f17 to 8bc4758 Compare November 13, 2026 00:19
@brow
brow force-pushed the git-publish-ci-fix branch from f4858cb to d6f06c2 Compare November 13, 2026 00:24
@jmecom
jmecom force-pushed the jm/git-formal-assurance branch from 8bc4758 to 2e3283b Compare November 13, 2026 00:49
…s in CI

Moving the ref snapshot into observe_push sent its CasError::ResourceLimit
through a catch-all 500 arm. Map it back to 413, as the publish path did,
and pin it with an infra-free finalize_push test.

Add api::git::cas_publish::tests and transport::track_c_tests to the
infra-free unit lane (and its cargo-test fallback) so the publish-decision
tests run in CI; their Postgres/MinIO cases stay #[ignore]d.

Qualify the doc's Lean claim: a successful write rules out intervening
writes that changed the pointer. The model omits the default-branch
setter, whose same-value write rewrites the same body.

Signed-off-by: Tom Brow <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: studio <dc2fc481343672df31a689840c09299972e704dac592e0da6f18486646a7ee3e@localhost>
@brow
brow force-pushed the git-publish-ci-fix branch from 350997f to bc07280 Compare November 13, 2026 00:56
@brow
brow marked this pull request as ready for review November 13, 2026 01:24
@brow
brow requested a review from a team as a code owner November 13, 2026 01:24
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 13, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-13T01:26:30.726789Z bc07280 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@wesbillman wesbillman left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 Carl, an automated reviewer, commenting via Wes's GitHub account.

No blockers at bc07280. The exact-head Rust / Unit Tests log shows all four named tests passing, including snapshot_resource_limit_answers_413. The new 413 arm matches the publish path's existing handling.

Non-blocking description notes:

  • The title says this PR gates the push fixture to unix, but the base already does that. This PR's delta is the CI filter, the 413 arm and the doc wording.
  • "Their Postgres/MinIO cases are #[ignore]d and stay in the PostgreSQL lane" overstates coverage. No CI lane selects the five ignored track_c_tests::external_infra_minio_tests cases, and live_cas_publish_compacts_and_rehydrates passes as a no-op unless BUZZ_GIT_S3_PROBE=1 is set. That predates this PR; the description just shouldn't claim it.
  • The buzz://message?... review link won't resolve for public readers.

@brow brow changed the title test(relay): gate push fixture to unix and run git publish tests in CI fix(relay): keep 413 for ref-snapshot limits and run git publish tests in CI Nov 13, 2026

@wesbillman wesbillman left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 Carl, an automated reviewer, commenting via Wes’s GitHub account.

No blockers. The ResourceLimit → 413 arm is sound ahead of the disposition: hydrated parents already sit within the 10k-ref / 4 MiB manifest bounds, so only a push that grew the workspace past them can trip it. It returns before any serving lease, CAS or kind:30618, and dropping ctx cleans up the workspace. The new test goes through production finalize_push → observe_push → snapshot_workspace, and without the arm it gets a 500.

Validation: Rust / Unit Tests on this head ran every newly selected cas_publish::tests and track_c_tests case, including snapshot_resource_limit_answers_413 (1.2s) and the three cases named in the description. The doc rewording matches cas_sees_no_intervening_write and the setter in settings.rs (a same-HEAD set CAS-writes the original digest).

Two optional wording nits are inline. Not approving: that needs Wes's explicit sign-off.

happened since the read.
that changed the pointer happened since the read (the Lean model omits the
default-branch setter, whose same-value write rewrites the same body and so
preserves the argument of the previous paragraph).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: this parenthetical was copied from the Theorem 3 section, but here it sits in the Lean bullet list, so "the previous paragraph" has no matching paragraph above it. Suggest "...preserves the argument of Theorem 3" (or whichever section you mean). Optionally, "a pointer body never recurs" two lines up could say "never returns after changing", since the same-value setter rewrites the same body.

Comment thread Justfile
# ::probe module stays opt-in). All are infra-free
# ::probe module stays opt-in), and the git push publish decision
# (api::git::cas_publish::tests and transport::track_c_tests, whose
# Postgres/MinIO cases are #[ignore]d). All are infra-free

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: not every live case here is #[ignore]d. cas_publish::tests::live_cas_publish_compacts_and_rehydrates returns early unless BUZZ_GIT_S3_PROBE=1, so this lane now reports it as PASS (0.013s in the CI log) without running it. That's harmless, but the comment (and the PR description) overstate it. Either say "#[ignore]d or env-gated", or mark that test #[ignore] so a skip doesn't show up as a pass.

@jmecom
jmecom merged commit bc07280 into jm/git-formal-assurance Nov 13, 2026
102 checks passed
@jmecom
jmecom deleted the git-publish-ci-fix branch November 13, 2026 17:37
jmecom added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2026
…ocol by refinement (#9425)

## Summary

This PR is stacked on #9064. It does two things to the
Git-on-object-storage code in `buzz-relay`. It replaces the TLA+ model
of the push protocol with one that states what the protocol is supposed
to implement and checks that it does. It also changes the rule by which
the relay decides whether to publish a push, because the new model shows
that the rule #9064 introduces still publishes requests in which git
accepted nothing.

### Relationship to #9064

The branch is `main`, then the two commits of #9064, then four commits
of this PR: the specification work, the publish-rule change, a review
fix merged from #9429, and a fix to `check.sh`. A merge of `main`
follows them; it was needed because `main` changed `Justfile`, which
#9429 also edits, after the branch point. The first two commits are
#9064's, replayed onto current `main` without conflicts and otherwise
unchanged. The base of this PR stays `main` because #9064's branch is
about 200 commits behind it. Once #9064 merges, this branch can be
rebased and the diff shrinks to the last four commits. Until then,
review the commits after the first two.

This PR keeps two of #9064's three changes as they are: the
`published_at` stamp that orders kind:30618 events by the manifest
chain, and `protect_landed`, which lets a landed conditional write stand
when the serving lease lapses after it. It replaces the third, the
publish rule.

### The publish rule

#9064 publishes when git exits 0 and the status report has an `ok` line
or no `ng` line. That handles a push in which one ref is updated and
another refused. The report, however, is not evidence of what git did.

- git exits 0 for a request that carries no commands, and for a push the
pre-receive hook declined. A decline is reported only to a client that
negotiated `report-status`. For a request with no commands, and for a
decline when the client did not negotiate a report, there is no `ng`
line. The relay then writes the pointer and emits a relay-signed
kind:30618 event that names the caller as pusher, although the push
policy approved nothing.
- The report is read from a stream whose framing the client's
capabilities determine, so the decision depends on parsing a
client-shaped stream.

The decision is now taken from the workspace. `push_disposition`
compares the refs after receive-pack with the refs the workspace was
hydrated from. Unchanged refs are answered with git's own output and
nothing is published. Changed refs are published if git exited normally.
Changed refs after an abnormal exit fail the request. The snapshot that
is compared is the one `cas_publish` publishes, so git's per-ref report
is true of the published state. The status-report scanner and its tests
are removed, and the ref-name conflict case they covered moves into the
table-driven test described below.

Three smaller changes follow. The ref-snapshot parser now fails closed:
output that was not UTF-8 used to read as an empty ref set and a
malformed line was skipped, and either would publish a manifest that
lacks refs. `manifest_changed` in `finalize_push` could not be false and
is removed. Taking the snapshot before the publish decision moved its
resource-limit error (snapshot larger than 4 MiB, or more refs than a
manifest may hold) onto a path that answered 500; #9429 restores the 413
the publish path gave before and adds
`snapshot_resource_limit_answers_413`.

### What the specification work adds

- `docs/spec/GitRefDB.tla` is the specification: a ref database in which
a push takes effect in one step, is applied only if authorized and only
against the old values it names, and is reported truthfully.
- `docs/spec/GitOnObjectStore.tla` is the protocol: several refs, an
object graph with reachability, packs, compaction, the pre-receive hook,
the publish decision, the default-branch setter, repository creation,
and a reader. `git receive-pack` is represented by a stated contract
rather than modeled internally.
- The correctness statement is `Refines`: every behavior of the protocol
is a behavior of the specification. TLC checks it together with the
store invariants (fence, reader completeness, closure of published
manifests).
- `docs/spec/check.sh` pins TLC 1.7.4 by SHA-256 and runs 28 checks.
Eight instances must pass. Nineteen seeded design errors must each be
detected with the violation named for them. One coverage check confirms
that a behavior the properties depend on (git reporting `ok` for a
command that changes nothing) is reachable. A name passed to `check.sh`
that is not a check is an error, so a misspelled selection cannot report
success.
- Both earlier publish rules are among the seeded errors: the original
rule (exit 0 and no `ng`) and #9064's status-report rule. For each, TLC
reports a publication the policy did not approve
(`PublishIsAuthorizedChange`) and a violation of `Refines`.
- `docs/spec/GitPushPath.qnt`, the Quint model from #9064 that covers
the serving lease and the event timestamps, is extended. The publish
rule becomes a parameter with three values, a request may carry no
commands or come from a client without a status report, and a new
invariant, `publicationChangesRefs`, states that a published manifest
differs in its refs from the one it replaces. The implemented rule
satisfies all four invariants; the status-report rule violates the new
one with a zero-command request.
- `docs/spec/lean/GitPointer.lean` is a Lean 4 proof, with no
dependencies, of the pointer discipline for any number of clients, refs
and objects: the fence, closure, that every pointer change is a legal
step from the value it replaces, that the length of the pointer's
predecessor chain equals the number of pointer writes, and that a
successful conditional write implies no intervening write.
- `.github/workflows/spec.yml` runs TLC and Lean when a file under
`docs/spec/` changes. On this PR's first run the TLC job took 10 minutes
19 seconds and the Lean job 22 seconds. Quint is not run in CI.
- `docs/git-on-object-storage.md` is revised to match. The push listing
follows the implemented order. The verification section separates
definitions, assumptions, results checked by TLC, results proved in
Lean, results checked with Quint, evidence about the implementation, and
limitations. The invariant names cited by code comments and by migration
0002 are kept as aliases in the TLA+ module.

### Assumptions and limitations

The TLC results hold for the bounded instances in `check.sh`, not for
arbitrary sizes. The Lean proof is unbounded but covers the pointer
discipline only, not the refinement. The Quint results are from random
simulation (2,000,000 runs of at most 14 steps) and a bounded symbolic
check (8 steps, Apalache); neither is a proof for unbounded runs. All of
them rest on the assumptions named in the document: the object store's
conditional-write semantics, ETag equality implying body equality, no
SHA-256 collision among the values that occur, the stated contract for
`git receive-pack`, and the policy endpoint deciding authorization. The
correspondence between the models and the Rust code is established by
reading the code and by the tests below; it is not mechanized.

The document states one assumption that #9064's ordering fix depends on
and that no model covers (Assumption C1). A manifest whose parent
carries no `published_at` (the empty manifest written when a repository
is announced, or a manifest written before the field existed) is stamped
with the writing instance's current time plus one second. Its event is
selected over the parent's only if that value exceeds the parent event's
`created_at`, which was taken from the clock of the instance that
emitted it. This holds when one instance handles both, and otherwise
when the writing instance's clock is not behind the other's by more than
the time elapsed between the two events. The assumption concerns one
write per repository. The document lists its removal as a proposed
extension, for example by having the first push after an unstamped
manifest read the stored event's `created_at` and exceed it.

### Related issue

Related to #2621 (CI for the formal models). This adds the TLC job for
the git model and a Lean job; it does not cover the Tamarin models or
the NIP-PL scripts, so it should not close that issue.

### Testing

Run locally on the restacked branch:

- `docs/spec/check.sh`: 28 checks, each with the expected result (8
pass, 19 seeded errors violate the named property, 1 coverage witness
reached). About three minutes on 16 cores; the largest instance has
6,773,286 distinct states.
- `lake build` in `docs/spec/lean` (Lean 4.33.1): succeeds. The safety
theorems depend only on `propext`, `Classical.choice` and `Quot.sound`.
- Quint 0.33.0, `GitPushPath.qnt`: `quint run --main fixed --invariant
safety --max-steps 14 --max-samples 2000000 --seed 0x1` reports no
violation; `quint verify --main fixed --invariant safety --max-steps 8`
(Apalache 0.62.1) reports no violation; each single-defect module
produces the counterexample the document lists.
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` and `cargo clippy -p buzz-relay
--all-targets -- -D warnings`: clean.
- `cargo nextest run -p buzz-relay --lib -E 'test(/^api::git::/) +
test(/side_effects/)'`: 158 passed.
- The storage-backed `finalize_push` tests
(`api::git::transport::track_c_tests::external_infra_minio_tests`, with
`--run-ignored ignored-only`) against local Postgres and MinIO: 5
passed.
- `e2e_git` against a local relay built from this branch, with Postgres,
Redis and MinIO: 3 passed (clone/push/fetch/force-push round trip,
concurrent push, partially refused push). The storage probe in that test
needs `BUZZ_E2E_GIT_COMMUNITY_ID` set to the local community's id.
- `just file-size-check` and `just security-review-check`: pass.

Two regression tests bind the changed decision to production code, and
both were confirmed to fail when the decision is forced back to the exit
status:

- `push_is_published_exactly_when_receive_pack_changed_refs` runs real
git through the production `run_git_at` and `observe_push` for seven
ways a push can end: a request with no commands, a push the hook
declines with and without a status report, an accepted push, an accepted
command that asks for the value the ref already has, a push in which one
ref is updated and another refused for its old value, and a push that
creates two refs whose names conflict, of which git creates one and
refuses the other. It needs no services. Which of the two conflicting
refs git creates depends on the git version (2.50 creates the first
command's ref, 2.56 on the flake-check runner creates the other), so the
test accepts either outcome and requires that each ref is in the
published snapshot exactly when git reported `ok` for it. The first
version of this case assumed one outcome and failed the Rust flake check
for that reason. Before #9429, `just test-unit` selected neither
`api::git::cas_publish::tests` nor `api::git::transport::track_c_tests`,
so this test ran only in the flake check; both modules are now in the
unit-test lane (45 tests, none needing services). It is Unix-only
because its hook fixture sets file modes; the first push of this PR
failed Windows clippy for that reason, and the test and its fixture are
now gated with `#[cfg(unix)]`. That gating has not been compiled for
Windows locally, so the Windows CI job is the check.
- `finalize_push_publishes_nothing_when_receive_pack_changed_no_ref`
calls `finalize_push` with an unchanged workspace and checks that the
pointer is not written and no kind:30618 event is stored. It needs
Postgres and an object store.

Not done, or not covered:

- No CI job selects the storage-backed `finalize_push` tests or
`e2e_git`, so the second regression test and the end-to-end tests are
evidence only when someone runs them. Adding them to CI needs a change
to the test fixture, which applies migrations itself, and is left as a
follow-up.
- `just ci` was not run in full.
- No human has tested the change. The human-testing step of the
readiness checklist in `AGENTS.md` is not met, and
`buzz-review-completed` is not claimed.

The local secret-scanning hook (`sadscan`) was skipped for the commits
and pushes that touch `crates/buzz-relay/src/api/git/settings_tests.rs`.
It scans whole files and flags the P-256 test key fixtures that file
already contains on `main`; this branch adds no key material.

---------

Signed-off-by: Jordan Mecom <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tom Brow <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Tom Brow <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: studio <dc2fc481343672df31a689840c09299972e704dac592e0da6f18486646a7ee3e@localhost>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants