Skip to content

docs: point the README to Buzz 1.0 in block/buzz-app - #9296

Merged
ngthuydiem merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
diem/readme-point-to-buzz-app
Nov 9, 2026
Merged

ngthuydiem merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
diem/readme-point-to-buzz-app

Conversation

@ngthuydiem

@ngthuydiem ngthuydiem commented Nov 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The README doesn't mention Buzz 1.0, so anyone who lands here can't tell that a newer app exists. The block/buzz-app README already links back here ("Buzz 0.X is still available and supported in block/buzz"). This adds the link the other way: a note at the top that Buzz 1.0 lives in block/buzz-app and that this repository is the 0.X line, which is still supported. It also says plugins are new in 1.0 and their API is a preview, linking to buzz-app's plugin architecture doc. This repository has no plugin API, so the note points there instead of repeating buzz-app's stability details.

Docs only, a 4-line README change.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-authored-by: Fizz <6be7be23ec5bba868f3e1db5ec86013d76bd1a293dce5b435a192158fec13641@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Diem Nguyen <[email protected]>
@ngthuydiem

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

🤖 Docs checks on this branch:

ok  GitHub GFM render of the README top: NOTE callout renders (1 alert block)
ok  https://github.com/block/buzz-app -> HTTP 200

@ngthuydiem
ngthuydiem marked this pull request as ready for review November 9, 2026 19:55
@ngthuydiem
ngthuydiem requested a review from a team as a code owner November 9, 2026 19:55
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the codex-security-review-current The posted Codex security review matches its recorded range. label Nov 9, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔐 Codex Security Review

Note: This is an automated, security-focused review generated by Codex.
Use it as a supplement to human review; false positives are possible.

Scope

  • Exact PR diff: 49511f02b6020ccd195848b3bfd431f0ec82d3c0...a223481eb434db76aebd76e645c9391f6a92a4ae
  • Model: gpt-6.1-sol

💡 Click "edited" above to see earlier reviews for this PR.


Review Summary

Overall Risk: NONE

The authorized PR range only adds a README notice about Buzz 1.0 and its preview plugin API. No executable code, configuration, dependencies, or deployment behavior changes. No concrete security, correctness, or reliability findings.

Findings

No concrete security, correctness, or reliability findings were identified.

Notes

  • No additional limitations were reported.

Generated by Codex Security Review |
Requested by: @ngthuydiem |
Workflow run

ngthuydiem and others added 2 commits November 9, 2026 12:22
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Diem Nguyen <[email protected]>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Diem Nguyen <[email protected]>
@ngthuydiem ngthuydiem changed the title docs: point the README to Buzz 1.0 beta in block/buzz-app docs: point the README to Buzz 1.0 in block/buzz-app Nov 9, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added codex-security-review-current The posted Codex security review matches its recorded range. and removed codex-security-review-current The posted Codex security review matches its recorded range. labels Nov 9, 2026

@kazemek21 kazemek21 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 Kyle reviewed the PR and the Nexus review-tracker notes and approved with no comments.

— Posted by Codex (gpt-6.1-sol) on behalf of kylez

@ngthuydiem
ngthuydiem merged commit 18f3e35 into main Nov 9, 2026
42 checks passed
@ngthuydiem
ngthuydiem deleted the diem/readme-point-to-buzz-app branch November 9, 2026 22:39
wpfleger96 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2026
…e-mode

* origin/main:
  ci(docker): skip relay image publishes for main pushes outside the build context (#9310)
  Add manual-only relay image publishing (#9303)
  fix(mobile): bump Flutter to 3.47.9 for Android TLS fix (#9309)
  Serve video and poster previews for invite links (#9306)
  docs: point the README to Buzz 1.0 in block/buzz-app (#9296)
  fix(db): give the replica-fence probe its own pool and instrument it (#9297)
  fix(relay): never close connections when cross-node fan-out falls behind (#9302)
  test: fix timing-dependent unit tests in buzz-cli, buzz-agent and buzz-admin (#9273)
  fix(ci): classify hermit retry timeouts by watchdog kill, not whole seconds (#9274)
  test(ios): wait for a key, foreground-active window before presenting in RunnerTests (#9275)
  test(desktop): wait on real readiness signals in audience and community-rail specs (#9277)

Signed-off-by: Will Pfleger <[email protected]>
philazar added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2026
* origin/main:
  Add swipeable photo stacks and native iOS gallery preview (#9259)
  ci(docker): skip relay image publishes for main pushes outside the build context (#9310)
  Add manual-only relay image publishing (#9303)
  fix(mobile): bump Flutter to 3.47.9 for Android TLS fix (#9309)
  Serve video and poster previews for invite links (#9306)
  docs: point the README to Buzz 1.0 in block/buzz-app (#9296)

Signed-off-by: Philip Azar <[email protected]>

This branch was previously deployed

1 inactive deployment
codex-review — a223481e Deployed Nov 9, 2026 by ngthuydiem via Run Codex Security Review #14087
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

codex-security-review-current The posted Codex security review matches its recorded range.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants