What you did here is the very first step of this task: #2975

This is the scope of the task
#2969 (comment)

@OpenLedgerApp please take a screenshot from Barter transaction confirmation page (https://develop.bitshares.org/#/barter)? Thanks. I need the JSON of the whole transaction but not only JSON of individual operations (for issue #2657).

@sschiessl-bcp fixed.
now it looks like:

SetDefaultFeeAssetModal is openning when you click on the arrow.

@abitmore

@OpenLedgerApp thanks. The transaction about proposal is fine, but I wrongly stated my needs. So this is the update: in the first picture, the transaction to cancel multiple orders in a batch, I need a JSON of the whole transaction, but not (only) multiple JSONs for individual operations.

@OpenLedgerApp thanks. The transaction about proposal is fine, but I wrongly stated my needs. So this is the update: in the first picture, the transaction to cancel multiple orders in a batch, I need a JSON of the whole transaction, but not (only) multiple JSONs for individual operations.

The "Show raw json" shows you the tree of the whole transaction. Let's do copyable text in #3020

The "Show raw json" shows you the tree of the whole transaction.

What I meant is a json of the whole transaction to be signed, but not an operation in the transaction. Current implementation only shows a tree of a single operation. I asked for barter because I made a mistake, thought it would contain multiple operations. Later I asked for "the transaction to cancel multiple orders in a batch" which will contain multiple operations in a transaction.

@OpenLedgerApp does it only show assets that are valid in fee pool and user balance to actually pay the tx fee?

@sschiessl-bcp no, it shows all user balances, like on the settings page

@sschiessl-bcp no, it shows all user balances, like on the settings page

It should only show asset that can actually be used, in the settings that is fine, but here it would break UX. Please add it to this issue, but please note #3044 first.

Do I assume correctly that you are not interested in finishing this task? @OpenLedgerApp

@sschiessl-bcp No, i'm interested in this task, but i will finish it in a few weeks

@sschiessl-bcp No, i'm interested in this task, but i will finish it in a few weeks

Could you please be a bit more precise in the expected timeline?

I assume you have no interest anymore.