Skip to content

Conversation

@droark
Copy link
Contributor

@droark droark commented Dec 27, 2016

  • Clarify the Windows Subsystem For Linux section.
  • Clarify the build requirements.

@fanquake
Copy link
Member

fanquake commented Dec 27, 2016

Looks ok. utACK 1f30bc3

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: not sure if we should set the jobs amount in the documentation. IMO we also don't do that for other build docs. It depends on available RAM/cores.

Copy link
Member

@sipa sipa Dec 27, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you're going to add -j in places, at least explain that it impacts parallellism in a comment.

@droark
Copy link
Contributor Author

droark commented Dec 27, 2016

Removed the -j flags (my own and the ones that were present) and did a fixup/reword. @jonasschnelli and @sipa brought up good points regarding parallelism. Doing a parallel make on the depends portion caused several errors on my system. I was able to keep trying and get it to work but it wasn't ideal.

- Clarify the Windows Subsystem For Linux section.
- Clarify the build requirements.
@droark
Copy link
Contributor Author

droark commented Jan 1, 2017

Also, just to clarify, I did successfully build and run the 32-bit version. make check passed too.

@maflcko
Copy link
Member

maflcko commented Jan 1, 2017

ACK b705a04

@maflcko maflcko merged commit b705a04 into bitcoin:master Jan 1, 2017
maflcko pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 1, 2017
b705a04 Update the Windows build notes (Douglas Roark)
codablock pushed a commit to codablock/dash that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2018
b705a04 Update the Windows build notes (Douglas Roark)
andvgal pushed a commit to energicryptocurrency/gen2-energi that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2019
b705a04 Update the Windows build notes (Douglas Roark)
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants