Skip to content

Conversation

@instagibbs
Copy link
Member

Logic change removing nValue check is fine since value won't be negative, and thus can give a better error.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you want to include this line too?
Not sure it's worth changing these, but if you are going to, perhaps you could be even more clear
"One of the transaction output amounts .." or similar

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you're right not important, thought I changed it back

@sipa
Copy link
Member

sipa commented Nov 22, 2016

utACK

@fanquake fanquake added the Docs label Nov 23, 2016
@laanwj
Copy link
Member

laanwj commented Nov 23, 2016

utACK 918b126

@fanquake
Copy link
Member

utACK 918b126

@jonasschnelli
Copy link
Contributor

trivial utACK 918b126

@laanwj laanwj merged commit 918b126 into bitcoin:master Nov 23, 2016
laanwj added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2016
918b126 fix CreateTransaction error messages (instagibbs)
codablock pushed a commit to codablock/dash that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2018
918b126 fix CreateTransaction error messages (instagibbs)
andvgal pushed a commit to energicryptocurrency/gen2-energi that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2019
918b126 fix CreateTransaction error messages (instagibbs)
CryptoCentric pushed a commit to absolute-community/absolute that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2019
918b126 fix CreateTransaction error messages (instagibbs)
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants