Skip to content

Conversation

@smatthewenglish
Copy link
Contributor

I'd like to get the hang of how to make pull requests and contribute. there was no German there, but Turkish and French- many Bitcoiners are German- so- maybe it would be useful

@maflcko
Copy link
Member

maflcko commented Oct 11, 2016

This should probably be changed to just "Bitcoin Core GUI" or "Bitcoin Core".

[Desktop Entry]
Encoding=UTF-8
Name=Bitcoin
Comment=Bitcoin P2P Cryptocurrency
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I checked some programs and the default seems to be imperative style, so maybe change to:

Connect to the Bitcoin P2P Network

@laanwj laanwj added the Docs label Oct 11, 2016
@smatthewenglish
Copy link
Contributor Author

it's there some kind of- particular naming convention for the branch, if it should be merged? I guess I didn't do that correctly in this instance

@smatthewenglish
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think I've made the change you requested, is it so?

Comment=Bitcoin P2P Cryptocurrency
Comment=Connect to the Bitcoin P2P Network
Comment[fr]=Bitcoin, monnaie virtuelle cryptographique pair à pair
Comment[de]=Bitcoin, eine virtuelle kryptographische peer-to-peer Währung
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess this should match the English one. I.e.

"Verbinde mit dem Bitcoin peer-to-peer Netzwerk" (oder ähnlich)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok cool, I've made the change.

@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
[Desktop Entry]
Encoding=UTF-8
Name=Bitcoin
Copy link
Member

@maflcko maflcko Oct 11, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok cool, I had planned to do it today but life interveened, I'll do it tomorrow :)

@smatthewenglish
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think I've made a mistake which is, I made those changes directly in the window of GitHub, and they don't exist on my local repo, seems they're only in this patch here. Is there some way to incorporate those changes to my local repo so I can do the squashing procedure?

@laanwj
Copy link
Member

laanwj commented Oct 17, 2016

Is there some way to incorporate those changes to my local repo so I can do the squashing procedure?

git pull origin patch-4

(where origin is the name that you gave to your github remote)

@smatthewenglish
Copy link
Contributor Author

smatthewenglish commented Oct 17, 2016

so- origin/master? or... I just ran exactly git pull origin patch-4 and it seemed to work

@smatthewenglish
Copy link
Contributor Author

now I need to issue the command git rebase -i HEAD~n isn't it? do you know how I can figure out what is n?

@fanquake
Copy link
Member

@s-matthew-english n is the number of commits you've made.

@smatthewenglish
Copy link
Contributor Author

my terminal tells me I'm ahead of origin/master by 5 commits, so then- is it 5? how can I check that?

@smatthewenglish
Copy link
Contributor Author

hmm, I've been trying to squash it for a while now, did it work?

@smatthewenglish
Copy link
Contributor Author

@achow101
Copy link
Member

@s-matthew-english didn't seem to work. Did you force push?

@smatthewenglish
Copy link
Contributor Author

yeah :/ strange

@smatthewenglish
Copy link
Contributor Author

do I force push it to upstream/master or origin/master?

@achow101
Copy link
Member

it depends on which one points to your repo. It's probably origin/master, but you can try both. The worst that will happen is that you will get an error about not being able to push to one of those.

@smatthewenglish
Copy link
Contributor Author

what about this:

smatthewenglish@238fbce

@achow101
Copy link
Member

Close. Do it for your patch-4 branch. Also, the commit message should be cut down to just one message that describes the changes simply.

@smatthewenglish
Copy link
Contributor Author

hmm, is there a way to retroactively change to commit mesage? I think I've now done it for patch-4, did it work?

@achow101
Copy link
Member

Nope. something very wrong happened. I think you pushed your whole master branch.

@smatthewenglish
Copy link
Contributor Author

:/ shit- is there a way to... back it up to before I did that and then take another crack at it?

@achow101
Copy link
Member

At this point you could just do it the "hard" way. Reset to Bitcoin master (git reset --hard upstream/master assuming upstream is to bitcoin/bitcoin) then make your final changes, commit, and force push.

@smatthewenglish
Copy link
Contributor Author

on which branch 'patch-4'?

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Andrew C [email protected] wrote:

At this point you could just do it the "hard" way. Reset to Bitcoin master
(git reset --hard upstream/master assuming upstream is to
bitcoin/bitcoin) then make your final changes, commit, and force push.


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#8908 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIonIN8wQ9bs4D6FHdTP5hOONYbQYSyhks5q05YIgaJpZM4KTb1V
.

@achow101
Copy link
Member

yes

@smatthewenglish
Copy link
Contributor Author

:/ but when I run 'git merge-base patch-4 upstream/master' it says only
"noop"

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Andrew C [email protected] wrote:

yes


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#8908 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIonIPtppENShC7-cH9nGZJAcHc6Zq_8ks5q05a_gaJpZM4KTb1V
.

@sipa
Copy link
Member

sipa commented Oct 17, 2016

Maybe this discussion can be held more effectively on IRC?

@achow101
Copy link
Member

Don't do any merges. Just reset the branch like I told you above. You should end up doing something like this:

git checkout patch-4
git reset --hard upstream/master

# Do your changes again

git commit -a
git push -f origin

@smatthewenglish
Copy link
Contributor Author

ok- I think I've just done it- did it work?

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Andrew C [email protected] wrote:

Don't do any merges. Just reset the branch like I told you above. You
should end up doing something like this:

git checkout patch-4
git reset --hard upstream/master

Do your changes again

git commit -a
git push -f origin


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#8908 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIonIMek2Y1hGI3b1EB3dr4R5P1g1syfks5q05f_gaJpZM4KTb1V
.

@achow101
Copy link
Member

Almost. Somehow a change to src/crypto/hmac_sha256.cpp slipped in.

Just remove that change and then use git commit -a --amend to modify the existing commit.

@smatthewenglish
Copy link
Contributor Author

ok- I think I've done it. is it so?

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Andrew C [email protected] wrote:

Almost. Somehow a change to src/crypto/hmac_sha256.cpp slipped in.

Just remove that change and then use git commit -a --amend to modify the
existing commit.


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#8908 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIonIAMrSy4XKlQAaz51fLHkQ1-0s4k2ks5q05o_gaJpZM4KTb1V
.

@achow101
Copy link
Member

Yes, it is correct now.

@maflcko
Copy link
Member

maflcko commented Oct 17, 2016

@smatthewenglish
Copy link
Contributor Author

:D cool- thank you for helping me figure this out

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Andrew C [email protected] wrote:

Yes, it is correct now.


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#8908 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIonIGIh8mufhLQd6WseIENp0t8MWSVDks5q05vHgaJpZM4KTb1V
.

@smatthewenglish
Copy link
Contributor Author

how about that one?

@maflcko
Copy link
Member

maflcko commented Oct 17, 2016

utACK 164196b

@jonasschnelli
Copy link
Contributor

utACK 164196b

1 similar comment
@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Contributor

utACK 164196b

@jonasschnelli jonasschnelli merged commit 164196b into bitcoin:master Oct 18, 2016
jonasschnelli added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2016
164196b Simple Update to File 'bitcoin-qt.desktop' (matthias)
luke-jr pushed a commit to luke-jr/bitcoin that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2016
codablock pushed a commit to codablock/dash that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2018
164196b Simple Update to File 'bitcoin-qt.desktop' (matthias)
andvgal pushed a commit to energicryptocurrency/gen2-energi that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2019
164196b Simple Update to File 'bitcoin-qt.desktop' (matthias)
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants