Skip to content

Conversation

@maflcko
Copy link
Member

@maflcko maflcko commented Sep 13, 2016

After setting the default of usehd to true, we are no longer testing the legacy wallet.

This pull makes wallet.py test both wallets over time.

@maflcko
Copy link
Member Author

maflcko commented Sep 13, 2016

Unrelated travis failure in untouched script:

stderr:
   File "/home/travis/build/bitcoin/bitcoin/qa/rpc-tests/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 151, in main
    self.run_test()
  File "/home/travis/build/bitcoin/bitcoin/build/../qa/rpc-tests/p2p-compactblocks.py", line 598, in run_test
    self.test_compactblock_construction()
  File "/home/travis/build/bitcoin/bitcoin/build/../qa/rpc-tests/p2p-compactblocks.py", line 248, in test_compactblock_construction
    assert(self.test_node.last_cmpctblock is not None)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please use a deterministic sequence here, not random

@maflcko maflcko force-pushed the Mf1609-qaWalletLegacy branch from fafdc40 to faaa533 Compare September 14, 2016 10:09
@maflcko maflcko force-pushed the Mf1609-qaWalletLegacy branch from faaa533 to fa644d0 Compare September 14, 2016 10:15
@laanwj laanwj merged commit fa644d0 into bitcoin:master Sep 19, 2016
laanwj added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2016
fa644d0 [qa] wallet: Check legacy wallet as well (MarcoFalke)
@maflcko maflcko deleted the Mf1609-qaWalletLegacy branch September 19, 2016 13:57
luke-jr pushed a commit to luke-jr/bitcoin that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2016
codablock pushed a commit to codablock/dash that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2018
fa644d0 [qa] wallet: Check legacy wallet as well (MarcoFalke)
andvgal pushed a commit to energicryptocurrency/gen2-energi that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2019
fa644d0 [qa] wallet: Check legacy wallet as well (MarcoFalke)
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants