Skip to content

Conversation

@jl2012
Copy link
Contributor

@jl2012 jl2012 commented Sep 5, 2016

The value for "other" inputs should be -1 (0xffffffffffffffff) instead of 0

The value for "other" inputs should be -1 (0xffffffffffffffff) instead of 0
@sipa
Copy link
Member

sipa commented Sep 5, 2016

Any unit tests in which this is exposed?

@jl2012
Copy link
Contributor Author

jl2012 commented Sep 5, 2016

@sipa: yes, the Bare_137_CHECKSIG_random_flag in #8654

@fanquake fanquake added the Tests label Sep 5, 2016
@sdaftuar
Copy link
Member

sdaftuar commented Sep 6, 2016

utACK

@laanwj
Copy link
Member

laanwj commented Sep 6, 2016

Shouldn't this affect passing/non-passing of the test? Or is this part of the framework unused?

@sipa
Copy link
Member

sipa commented Sep 6, 2016

@laanwj It is unused until the introduction of the test in #8654 (which needs to pass a -1 explicitly for now).

@Christewart
Copy link
Contributor

utACK

@fanquake
Copy link
Member

fanquake commented Sep 9, 2016

utACK 2f2548d

@maflcko maflcko merged commit 2f2548d into bitcoin:master Sep 9, 2016
maflcko pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2016
2f2548d Fix SIGHASH_SINGLE bug in test_framework SignatureHash (Johnson Lau)
luke-jr pushed a commit to luke-jr/bitcoin that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2016
The value for "other" inputs should be -1 (0xffffffffffffffff) instead of 0

Github-Pull: bitcoin#8667
Rebased-From: 2f2548d
codablock pushed a commit to codablock/dash that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2018
…eHash

2f2548d Fix SIGHASH_SINGLE bug in test_framework SignatureHash (Johnson Lau)
codablock pushed a commit to codablock/dash that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2018
…eHash

2f2548d Fix SIGHASH_SINGLE bug in test_framework SignatureHash (Johnson Lau)
andvgal pushed a commit to energicryptocurrency/gen2-energi that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2019
…eHash

2f2548d Fix SIGHASH_SINGLE bug in test_framework SignatureHash (Johnson Lau)
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants