Skip to content

Conversation

@jtimon
Copy link
Contributor

@jtimon jtimon commented Jul 27, 2016

Pre-witness my plan was to get rid of ContextualCheckBlock and move its check to ConnectBlock/Consensus::VerifyTx, so this was not necessary.

This should be the last existing consensus function that needs to get Consensus::Params instead of ChainParams or call Params() from inside.

@jtimon jtimon force-pushed the 0.13-consensus-last-params branch from c238a55 to c8664ee Compare July 27, 2016 21:58
@jtimon
Copy link
Contributor Author

jtimon commented Jul 27, 2016

Sorry, contained an old TODO that wasn't true. Updated. Ping @NicolasDorier @dcousens

@dcousens
Copy link
Contributor

utACK c8664ee

@NicolasDorier
Copy link
Contributor

utACK c8664ee

@sipa
Copy link
Member

sipa commented Jul 29, 2016

utACK c8664ee

@paveljanik
Copy link
Contributor

utACK c8664ee

@btcdrak
Copy link
Contributor

btcdrak commented Jul 31, 2016

utACK c8664ee

@sipa sipa merged commit c8664ee into bitcoin:master Jul 31, 2016
sipa added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2016
…& in ContextualCheckBlock

c8664ee Trivial: pass Consensus::Params& instead of CChainParams& in ContextualCheckBlock (Jorge Timón)
codablock pushed a commit to codablock/dash that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2018
…nParams& in ContextualCheckBlock

c8664ee Trivial: pass Consensus::Params& instead of CChainParams& in ContextualCheckBlock (Jorge Timón)
andvgal pushed a commit to energicryptocurrency/gen2-energi that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2019
…nParams& in ContextualCheckBlock

c8664ee Trivial: pass Consensus::Params& instead of CChainParams& in ContextualCheckBlock (Jorge Timón)
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants