Improving wording related to Boost library requirements [updated] #7590
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks @laanwj and sorry about the second PR, I need to improve my git-fu... |
Member
Member
|
utACK 8c5a5fb |
laanwj
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 29, 2016
…[updated] 8c5a5fb Improving wording related to Boost library requirements [updated] (Jonathan Cross)
codablock
pushed a commit
to codablock/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 11, 2017
…ements [updated] 8c5a5fb Improving wording related to Boost library requirements [updated] (Jonathan Cross)
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixed formatting as requested on #7589
Description:
Documentation was unclear in this section and could be interpreted to mean that boost was not a hard requirement for older Ubuntu versions.
Related: #7587