Skip to content

Conversation

@jonathancross
Copy link
Contributor

Documentation was unclear in this section and could be interpreted to mean that boost was not a hard requirement for older Ubuntu versions.
Related: #7587

Documentation was unclear in this section and could be interpreted to mean that boost was not a hard requirement for older Ubuntu versions.
Related: #7587
@jonathancross jonathancross changed the title Improving wording related to required Boost library requirement Improving wording related to Boost library requirements Feb 24, 2016
install necessary parts of boost:

sudo apt-get install libboost-system-dev libboost-filesystem-dev libboost-chrono-dev libboost-program-options-dev libboost-test-dev libboost-thread-dev
`sudo apt-get install libboost-system-dev libboost-filesystem-dev libboost-chrono-dev libboost-program-options-dev libboost-test-dev libboost-thread-dev`
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: IMO if you use a 4-spaces-indent that's equivalent to `

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, either do

install necessary parts of boost:
```bash
<commands go here>
```

Or indent four spaces:

install necessary parts of boost:

    <commands go here>

Both is not valid markdown.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you both.
The Ordered list (numbers 1 and 2) formatting cause markdown to ignore the 4-space "code" indentation markup. I did some experimentation and now see that I need to indent 8 spaces to bring back the code formatting when in a list.

Now fixed.

@jonasschnelli
Copy link
Contributor

ACK 417e64b

Merging in latest changes.
Documentation was unclear in this section and could be interpreted to mean that boost was not a hard requirement for older Ubuntu versions.
Related: #7587

This squashed commit replaces backticks with additional 4-space code indentation.
@jonathancross
Copy link
Contributor Author

I went ahead and created a new clean pull request #7590 with a single commit and the formatting changes requested.

@jonathancross jonathancross deleted the patch-2 branch February 27, 2016 14:30
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants