net: Account for sendheaders verack messages
#7180
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Looks like these were forgotten in bitcoin#6589.
Contributor
|
Oh. Thanks! ACK. |
Contributor
|
ACK |
1 similar comment
|
ACK |
laanwj
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2015
e3bc5e0 net: Account for `sendheaders` `verack` messages (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
UdjinM6
pushed a commit
to dashpay/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 29, 2017
…n#7181: enable per-command byte counters in `CNode` (#1496) * log bytes recv/sent per command * net: Account for `sendheaders` `verack` messages Looks like these were forgotten in #6589. * Backport remaining part of Bitcoin PR bitcoin#7181. Most of this PR is already merged, but a small part remaining that makes per-command byte counts in CNode working. Signed-off-by: Oleg Girko <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Looks like these were forgotten in #6589. @jonasschnelli