Skip to content

Conversation

@sandakersmann
Copy link
Contributor

@fanquake
Copy link
Member

Previous pulls for the same change are #5242 & #5248.

@maaku
Copy link
Contributor

maaku commented Sep 18, 2015

NAK. Please there's no reason to cause rebase hell over a spelling issue. Would be more accepting if it wasn't changing 97 lines across 48 files.

@maflcko
Copy link
Member

maflcko commented Sep 18, 2015

NACK. I don't like the idea to be the first ones to impose Oxford Dictionary's view onto developers et al. (relevant xkcd). Unless there is a consistent trend observed across publications and online resources, we should just leave it as is and fix it when it's clear what to use.

@rebroad
Copy link
Contributor

rebroad commented Sep 18, 2015

NACK. "block" and "chain" are also in the dictionary.

@laanwj
Copy link
Member

laanwj commented Sep 18, 2015

Consensus is clear, closing

@laanwj laanwj closed this Sep 18, 2015
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants