-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.7k
Obfuscate chainstate #6650
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Obfuscate chainstate #6650
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ | ||
| // Copyright (c) 2012-2013 The Bitcoin Core developers | ||
| // Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying | ||
| // file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php. | ||
|
|
||
| #include "leveldbwrapper.h" | ||
| #include "uint256.h" | ||
| #include "random.h" | ||
| #include "test/test_bitcoin.h" | ||
|
|
||
| #include <boost/assign/std/vector.hpp> // for 'operator+=()' | ||
| #include <boost/assert.hpp> | ||
| #include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp> | ||
|
|
||
| using namespace std; | ||
| using namespace boost::assign; // bring 'operator+=()' into scope | ||
| using namespace boost::filesystem; | ||
|
|
||
| // Test if a string consists entirely of null characters | ||
| bool is_null_key(const vector<unsigned char>& key) { | ||
| bool isnull = true; | ||
|
|
||
| for (unsigned int i = 0; i < key.size(); i++) | ||
| isnull &= (key[i] == '\x00'); | ||
|
|
||
| return isnull; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(leveldbwrapper_tests, BasicTestingSetup) | ||
|
|
||
| BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(leveldbwrapper) | ||
| { | ||
| // Perform tests both obfuscated and non-obfuscated. | ||
| for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) { | ||
| bool obfuscate = (bool)i; | ||
| path ph = temp_directory_path() / unique_path(); | ||
| CLevelDBWrapper dbw(ph, (1 << 20), true, false, obfuscate); | ||
| char key = 'k'; | ||
| uint256 in = GetRandHash(); | ||
| uint256 res; | ||
|
|
||
| // Ensure that we're doing real obfuscation when obfuscate=true | ||
| BOOST_CHECK(obfuscate != is_null_key(dbw.GetObfuscateKey())); | ||
|
|
||
| BOOST_CHECK(dbw.Write(key, in)); | ||
| BOOST_CHECK(dbw.Read(key, res)); | ||
| BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(res.ToString(), in.ToString()); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Test that we do not obfuscation if there is existing data. | ||
| BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(existing_data_no_obfuscate) | ||
| { | ||
| // We're going to share this path between two wrappers | ||
| path ph = temp_directory_path() / unique_path(); | ||
| create_directories(ph); | ||
|
|
||
| // Set up a non-obfuscated wrapper to write some initial data. | ||
| CLevelDBWrapper* dbw = new CLevelDBWrapper(ph, (1 << 10), false, false, false); | ||
| char key = 'k'; | ||
| uint256 in = GetRandHash(); | ||
| uint256 res; | ||
|
|
||
| BOOST_CHECK(dbw->Write(key, in)); | ||
| BOOST_CHECK(dbw->Read(key, res)); | ||
| BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(res.ToString(), in.ToString()); | ||
|
|
||
| // Call the destructor to free leveldb LOCK | ||
| delete dbw; | ||
|
|
||
| // Now, set up another wrapper that wants to obfuscate the same directory | ||
| CLevelDBWrapper odbw(ph, (1 << 10), false, false, true); | ||
|
|
||
| // Check that the key/val we wrote with unobfuscated wrapper exists and | ||
| // is readable. | ||
| uint256 res2; | ||
| BOOST_CHECK(odbw.Read(key, res2)); | ||
| BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(res2.ToString(), in.ToString()); | ||
|
|
||
| BOOST_CHECK(!odbw.IsEmpty()); // There should be existing data | ||
| BOOST_CHECK(is_null_key(odbw.GetObfuscateKey())); // The key should be an empty string | ||
|
|
||
| uint256 in2 = GetRandHash(); | ||
| uint256 res3; | ||
|
|
||
| // Check that we can write successfully | ||
| BOOST_CHECK(odbw.Write(key, in2)); | ||
| BOOST_CHECK(odbw.Read(key, res3)); | ||
| BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(res3.ToString(), in2.ToString()); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Ensure that we start obfuscating during a reindex. | ||
| BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(existing_data_reindex) | ||
| { | ||
| // We're going to share this path between two wrappers | ||
| path ph = temp_directory_path() / unique_path(); | ||
| create_directories(ph); | ||
|
|
||
| // Set up a non-obfuscated wrapper to write some initial data. | ||
| CLevelDBWrapper* dbw = new CLevelDBWrapper(ph, (1 << 10), false, false, false); | ||
| char key = 'k'; | ||
| uint256 in = GetRandHash(); | ||
| uint256 res; | ||
|
|
||
| BOOST_CHECK(dbw->Write(key, in)); | ||
| BOOST_CHECK(dbw->Read(key, res)); | ||
| BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(res.ToString(), in.ToString()); | ||
|
|
||
| // Call the destructor to free leveldb LOCK | ||
| delete dbw; | ||
|
|
||
| // Simulate a -reindex by wiping the existing data store | ||
| CLevelDBWrapper odbw(ph, (1 << 10), false, true, true); | ||
|
|
||
| // Check that the key/val we wrote with unobfuscated wrapper doesn't exist | ||
| uint256 res2; | ||
| BOOST_CHECK(!odbw.Read(key, res2)); | ||
| BOOST_CHECK(!is_null_key(odbw.GetObfuscateKey())); | ||
|
|
||
| uint256 in2 = GetRandHash(); | ||
| uint256 res3; | ||
|
|
||
| // Check that we can write successfully | ||
| BOOST_CHECK(odbw.Write(key, in2)); | ||
| BOOST_CHECK(odbw.Read(key, res3)); | ||
| BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(res3.ToString(), in2.ToString()); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END() |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd put the implementation of these functions in leveldbwrapper.cpp instead of the header file (unless there's a reason I'm overlooking)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I implemented these in the header to maintain consistency with much of the rest of
CLevelDBWrapper, which is also defined here. I'll move what's below over to the.cppfile, but we should probably think about moving the rest of it out of the header at some point.