Can we s/Proof/CProof/ to keep naming consistent?

Renamed Proof -> CProof

Thanks!

Bringing description from #4793 here:

Following @laanwj 's advice of only moving ScanHash, I found another solution to encapsulate the miner's pow without removing the miner's optimization, which was rejected in #4423
But I would like to slightly change the behavior.
Commit "Replace proof.nNonce >= 0xffff000 with an iteration counter" should be either rejected or squashed into "proof.nNonce >= 0xffff0000 -> proof.OutOfRangeSolution()" (and of course that 1000 in the for is open for bike-shedding).
"Small miner optimization" also should be rejected or rebased in "Remove testnet's special case from miner.cpp".
I think these 2 functional changes are meaningless enough that can be safely accepted.
I would also be happy to just remove the hashmeter and the resulting PR would be simpler.

Automatic sanity-testing: PASSED, see http://jenkins.bluematt.me/pull-tester/p4794_d93c180cdf32141f857c1d61c2e85cae8406ec6f/ for binaries and test log.
This test script verifies pulls every time they are updated. It, however, dies sometimes and fails to test properly. If you are waiting on a test, please check timestamps to verify that the test.log is moving at http://jenkins.bluematt.me/pull-tester/current/
Contact BlueMatt on freenode if something looks broken.

Closing until #4506 and #4793 are merged