Skip to content

Conversation

@achow101
Copy link
Member

@achow101 achow101 commented Sep 24, 2024

@DrahtBot
Copy link
Contributor

DrahtBot commented Sep 24, 2024

The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

Code Coverage

For detailed information about the code coverage, see the test coverage report.

Reviews

See the guideline for information on the review process.

Type Reviewers
ACK sipa
Stale ACK hebasto

If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.

@achow101 achow101 added this to the 28.0 milestone Sep 24, 2024
@achow101 achow101 changed the title [28.x] Further backports [28.x] backports and finalize (or rc3) Sep 24, 2024
Copy link
Member

@hebasto hebasto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 1f6c3caf30849a6e53957aa15c6ac27b97004dc5.

A new backport only affects the test code, so I agree to skip the rc3 phase.

mzumsande and others added 3 commits September 25, 2024 14:34
The comparison of m_best_invalid with the tip of the respective chainstate
makes no sense for the background chainstate, and can lead to incorrect
error messages.

Github-Pull: bitcoin#30962
Rebased-From: c0a0c72
@achow101
Copy link
Member Author

Added #30962

I think it's trivial enough to not require rc3 as well.

Copy link
Contributor

@stickies-v stickies-v left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

code LGTM 98745e0

Verified all backport commits are clean and make sense, and that I'm getting the same manpages. I think doc/release-notes.md still needs to be updated though?

@achow101
Copy link
Member Author

I think doc/release-notes.md still needs to be updated though?

I think that's usually done when after the release is published on the website.

@achow101 achow101 changed the title [28.x] backports and finalize (or rc3) [28.x] backports and finalize Sep 30, 2024
@achow101
Copy link
Member Author

Hmm ok, will add those soon. Still some changes to be made on the release notes.

@achow101
Copy link
Member Author

achow101 commented Sep 30, 2024

Added release notes (as of eab8c9df5996bfe0d0997f747eefbdb745381aa0)

@instagibbs
Copy link
Member

LGTM 5de225f

@sipa
Copy link
Member

sipa commented Oct 1, 2024

utACK 5de225f

@DrahtBot DrahtBot requested a review from hebasto October 1, 2024 17:12
@achow101 achow101 merged commit 1101837 into bitcoin:28.x Oct 1, 2024
@glozow
Copy link
Member

glozow commented Oct 1, 2024

post merge ACK

@stickies-v
Copy link
Contributor

stickies-v commented Oct 1, 2024

Added release notes (as of eab8c9df5996bfe0d0997f747eefbdb745381aa0)

Thanks! I've added https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki/28.0-Release-Notes-Draft/6677e1b3aa3ecadd142786f1393d2a7affe9e03e which adds missing PR numbers.

Release notes otherwise LGTM, I verified the author list and read through the descriptions. I think these 3 might benefit from being added to the list too, I'll give them a go later:

Edit: oh, too late. I'm on bad wifi today, didn't see it got merged already.

Imebeez

This comment was marked as spam.

@bitcoin bitcoin locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 20, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants