Refactor: Remove unused FlatFilePos::SetNull #27289
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers. ReviewsSee the guideline for information on the review process.
If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update. |
Member
|
Concept ACK |
Member
|
Code review ACK fa67b81 |
Member
|
Concept ACK. |
Contributor
|
ACK fa67b81 |
Member
|
Door open for anyone to followup with more |
sidhujag
pushed a commit
to syscoin/syscoin
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2023
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is unused outside of tests and the default constructor. With C++11, it can be replaced by C++11 member initializers in the default constructor.
Beside removing unused code, this also makes it less fragile in light of uninitialized memory. (See also #26296 (comment))
If new code needs to set this to null, it can use
std::optional, or in the worst case re-introduce this method.