Skip to content

Conversation

@jonatack
Copy link
Member

@jonatack jonatack commented Jun 7, 2022

added by #7003 in 2015, as that potential issue would now be caught by the test/lint/lint-format-strings.py script run by the CI.

…section in dev notes

that was added in 2015 by commit b8c06ef in PR 7003, as that potential issue
would now be caught by the test/lint/lint-format-strings.py script run by the CI
@jonatack
Copy link
Member Author

jonatack commented Jun 7, 2022

Was wondering whether to update that section in the developer notes with LogPrintLevel and LogPrintfCategory, but it seems reasonable to just remove it now.

@maflcko
Copy link
Member

maflcko commented Jun 7, 2022

cr ACK 433b525

Copy link
Contributor

@w0xlt w0xlt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 433b525

@laanwj laanwj merged commit 9dae9f5 into bitcoin:master Jun 7, 2022
@jonatack jonatack deleted the update-lint-format-strings-and-dev-notes branch June 7, 2022 19:24
sidhujag pushed a commit to syscoin/syscoin that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2022
…ogPrint-vs-LogPrintf section in dev notes

433b525 Add LogPrintLevel to lint-format-strings, drop LogPrint-vs-LogPrintf section in dev notes (Jon Atack)

Pull request description:

  added by bitcoin#7003 in 2015, as that potential issue would now be caught by the `test/lint/lint-format-strings.py` script run by the CI.

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    cr ACK 433b525
  w0xlt:
    ACK bitcoin@433b525

Tree-SHA512: 91a2ac76689ed4f1f638e07c16d2ec8952fb013cc8bb896780fbd9333abd084281ce99afdc9de715d07a9abb4dce5dd67edf5e347aff466c6ef339ccc4158679
@bitcoin bitcoin locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 7, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants