test: Remove extended lint (cppcheck) #25091
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
These are unreferenced in the CI and documentation, and have been since 2019 (see bitcoin#17549). I'm not sure the cppcheck is worthwhile. It takes a long time to run (I think this is why it isn't in the normal lints), and right now it only appears to find implicit constructors. The list of exceptions is out of date. But if anyone wants to bring it back at any time in the future they can do so from git history (and port it to Python).
fanquake
approved these changes
May 9, 2022
Member
|
Also, it would be better if this was using the compile db instead of the |
sidhujag
pushed a commit
to syscoin/syscoin
that referenced
this pull request
May 9, 2022
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
These are unreferenced in the CI and documentation, and have been since 2019 (see #17549).
I'm not sure the cppcheck is worthwhile. It takes a long time to run (I think this is why it isn't in the normal lints), and right
now it only appears to find implicit constructors. The list of exceptions is out of date. But if anyone wants to bring it back at any
time in the future they can do so from git history (and port it to Python).