Skip to content

Conversation

@laanwj
Copy link
Member

@laanwj laanwj commented Apr 15, 2022

I have some qualms about maintaining a suspicious hosts list as part as the repository*. But also, it's stale and irrelevant. I've checked the entire list and none of them is connectable. Only one still appars in nodes_main.txt but with low uptime and an old subversion string so it wouldn't be picked in the first place. This change removes the list and the functionality to use it.

IP 8333 connectable in nodes_main.txt
130.211.129.106 no no
148.251.238.178 no no
176.9.46.6 no yes: /Satoshi:0.9.2.1/
178.63.107.226 no no
54.173.72.127 no no
54.174.10.182 no no
54.183.64.54 no no
54.194.231.211 no no
54.66.214.167 no no
54.66.220.137 no no
54.67.33.14 no no
54.77.251.214 no no
54.94.195.96 no no
54.94.200.247 no no
83.81.130.26 no no
88.198.17.7 no no

ref: #17020 (comment)

* besides the commit noise, potential legal issues around accountability and liability that would come with maintaining such a blocklist actively, I don't think we should expose the project to

I have some qualms with maintaining a suspicious hosts list as part as
the repository. But also, it's stale and irrelevant. I've checked the
entire list and none of them is connectable. Only one still appars in
`nodes_main.txt` but with low uptime and an old subversion string so it
wouldn't be picked in the first place.
@mruddy
Copy link
Contributor

mruddy commented Apr 15, 2022

Concept ACK this seems like not very effective cat and mouse stuff. I also looked through the code and the proposed change looks comprehensive / complete.

Copy link
Member

@jonatack jonatack left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 2f629f8

It looks like these haven't been updated since be22b3d in December 2014/January 2015.

Copy link

@ghost ghost left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 2f629f8

@maflcko
Copy link
Member

maflcko commented Apr 15, 2022

ACK

@Empact
Copy link
Contributor

Empact commented Apr 15, 2022

ACK 2f629f8

/cc @sipa, who introduced this list in be22b3d

@fanquake fanquake merged commit d2e0419 into bitcoin:master Apr 18, 2022
Fabcien pushed a commit to Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2022
Summary:
Backport of [[bitcoin/bitcoin#24862 | core#24862]] and skipping [[bitcoin/bitcoin#17823 | core#17823]]

The list is outdated and unmaintained. Additional rationale can be found in the original pr.

Test Plan: Run makeseeds according to readme.

Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, Fabien

Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, Fabien

Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D12143
@bitcoin bitcoin locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 18, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants