-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.7k
Run specified functional tests with all matching flags #23097
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Alternatively there's #20892 which will run both |
|
Thanks @achow101, wasn't aware of that PR. This is just a quick fix because its kinda inconvenient, and also works with the other test flags. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
review ACK b8909b0
This also helps with --mineblock, --usecli, ...
…matching flags b8909b0 Run functional tests with all possible flags (Samuel Dobson) Pull request description: Functional tests which use flags like `--descriptors` or `--legacy-wallet` won't run if only the base script is given to `test_runner.py` because it doesn't match any script in the list exactly. It would be easier if it would just run both options. For example, instead of: ``` test_runner.py 'wallet_basic.py --legacy-wallet' 'wallet_basic.py --descriptors' ``` We can now just run: ``` test_runner.py wallet_basic ``` Also useful for `--usecli`, the IPv4/IPv6/nonloopback `rpc_bind.py` variations, etc. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK b8909b0 MarcoFalke: review ACK b8909b0 Tree-SHA512: d367037cb170e705551726d47fe4569ebc3ceadece280dd3edbb3ecb41e19f3263d6d272b407316ed6011164e850df4321fb340b1b183b34497c9f7cc439f4d8
|
🐙 This pull request conflicts with the target branch and needs rebase. Want to unsubscribe from rebase notifications on this pull request? Just convert this pull request to a "draft". |
… flags b8909b0 Run functional tests with all possible flags (Samuel Dobson) Pull request description: Functional tests which use flags like `--descriptors` or `--legacy-wallet` won't run if only the base script is given to `test_runner.py` because it doesn't match any script in the list exactly. It would be easier if it would just run both options. For example, instead of: ``` test_runner.py 'wallet_basic.py --legacy-wallet' 'wallet_basic.py --descriptors' ``` We can now just run: ``` test_runner.py wallet_basic ``` Also useful for `--usecli`, the IPv4/IPv6/nonloopback `rpc_bind.py` variations, etc. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK b8909b0 MarcoFalke: review ACK b8909b0 Tree-SHA512: d367037cb170e705551726d47fe4569ebc3ceadece280dd3edbb3ecb41e19f3263d6d272b407316ed6011164e850df4321fb340b1b183b34497c9f7cc439f4d8
… flags b8909b0 Run functional tests with all possible flags (Samuel Dobson) Pull request description: Functional tests which use flags like `--descriptors` or `--legacy-wallet` won't run if only the base script is given to `test_runner.py` because it doesn't match any script in the list exactly. It would be easier if it would just run both options. For example, instead of: ``` test_runner.py 'wallet_basic.py --legacy-wallet' 'wallet_basic.py --descriptors' ``` We can now just run: ``` test_runner.py wallet_basic ``` Also useful for `--usecli`, the IPv4/IPv6/nonloopback `rpc_bind.py` variations, etc. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK b8909b0 MarcoFalke: review ACK b8909b0 Tree-SHA512: d367037cb170e705551726d47fe4569ebc3ceadece280dd3edbb3ecb41e19f3263d6d272b407316ed6011164e850df4321fb340b1b183b34497c9f7cc439f4d8
Functional tests which use flags like
--descriptorsor--legacy-walletwon't run if only the base script is given totest_runner.pybecause it doesn't match any script in the list exactly. It would be easier if it would just run both options.For example, instead of:
We can now just run:
Also useful for
--usecli, the IPv4/IPv6/nonloopbackrpc_bind.pyvariations, etc.