-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.8k
doc: Remove outdated comments #23094
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
They are outdated since bitcoin#14336.
dunxen
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
crACK ee7891a
ee7891a doc: Remove outdated comments (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: The first removed comment was introduced in bitcoin#5288, the second one in bitcoin#13503. Both are outdated since bitcoin#14336. ACKs for top commit: duncandean: crACK ee7891a Tree-SHA512: a2d6071919e81c916bfc2178109bbc464417321bcc567ed0644448c5faea8e58cb08a7657afa1b6ffe1fb63e114a2a47b31c893e471839ba9d49a3986e68b2a7
| nMaxConnections = std::max(nUserMaxConnections, 0); | ||
|
|
||
| // Trim requested connection counts, to fit into system limitations | ||
| // <int> in std::min<int>(...) to work around FreeBSD compilation issue described in #2695 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤦♂️
ouch, you are right...
…nd place comment correctly 8ff3743 Revert "doc: Remove outdated comments" (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: Unfortunately, in #23094 the assumption that #14336 makes comments outdated is wrong. As pointed in bitcoin/bitcoin#23094 (comment), the #14336 just moved the relevant code a few lines down. This PR reverts commit ee7891a, and moves the comments into the right place. I apologize about that. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: cr ACK 8ff3743 laanwj: ACK 8ff3743 Tree-SHA512: 84aca627bb5b49c06fc172778f9b9407482c5a873ccbc3dc40167e6a8ad0bc60475d6a469c843b7b42712e35cf3fc2d3518923e791d5e0c59628e042acc72747
… comment correctly 8ff3743 Revert "doc: Remove outdated comments" (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: Unfortunately, in bitcoin#23094 the assumption that bitcoin#14336 makes comments outdated is wrong. As pointed in bitcoin#23094 (comment), the bitcoin#14336 just moved the relevant code a few lines down. This PR reverts commit ee7891a, and moves the comments into the right place. I apologize about that. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: cr ACK 8ff3743 laanwj: ACK 8ff3743 Tree-SHA512: 84aca627bb5b49c06fc172778f9b9407482c5a873ccbc3dc40167e6a8ad0bc60475d6a469c843b7b42712e35cf3fc2d3518923e791d5e0c59628e042acc72747
The first removed comment was introduced in #5288, the second one in #13503.
Both are outdated since #14336.