Skip to content

Conversation

@glozow
Copy link
Member

@glozow glozow commented Apr 26, 2021

Follow up to #21062. Was going to be a part of #20833 but I'm trying to break it down as much as possible.

@jnewbery
Copy link
Contributor

ACK 363df75

@glozow
Copy link
Member Author

glozow commented Apr 26, 2021

The comments being addressed were from @MarcoFalke and @ariard

Copy link

@ariard ariard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review ACK 363df75

Thanks for addressing the suggestion.

@practicalswift
Copy link
Contributor

cr ACK 363df75: patch looks correct and const is better than non-const (where possible :))

@maflcko maflcko changed the title followups in MempoolAcceptResult refactor: Make MempoolAcceptResult members const Apr 28, 2021
@maflcko maflcko merged commit edf6795 into bitcoin:master Apr 28, 2021
@glozow glozow deleted the 2021-04-mempoolacceptresult branch April 28, 2021 13:50
sidhujag pushed a commit to syscoin/syscoin that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2021
363df75 doc/style followups in MempoolAcceptResult (glozow)

Pull request description:

  Follow up to bitcoin#21062. Was going to be a part of bitcoin#20833 but I'm trying to break it down as much as possible.

  - Make members const (bitcoin#21062 (comment))
  - List fee units (bitcoin#21062 (comment))
  - Use default value for `TxValidationState` in the success case (bitcoin#21062 (comment)).

ACKs for top commit:
  jnewbery:
    ACK 363df75
  practicalswift:
    cr ACK 363df75: patch looks correct and `const` is better than non-`const` (where possible :))
  ariard:
    Code Review ACK 363df75

Tree-SHA512: 0ff1a0279e08e03204e48d0f4c92428d7f39c32f52c1d20fe6a0283d605839898297344be82ca69640ba9f878ca4ebd5da2d717e26d719a183b211d709334082
gwillen pushed a commit to ElementsProject/elements that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2022
Fabcien pushed a commit to Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2022
Summary: This is a backport of [[bitcoin/bitcoin#21783 | core#21783]]

Test Plan: `ninja all check-all`

Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, Fabien

Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, Fabien

Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D11794
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 18, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants