Skip to content

Conversation

@maflcko
Copy link
Member

@maflcko maflcko commented Mar 12, 2021

Member variables are already passed to methods via this, so no need to pass them another time as function parameter.

@DrahtBot
Copy link
Contributor

DrahtBot commented Mar 12, 2021

The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

Conflicts

Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:

If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.

@DrahtBot
Copy link
Contributor

🕵️ @sipa has been requested to review this pull request as specified in the REVIEWERS file.

@dongcarl
Copy link
Contributor

Concept ACK 😌

Copy link
Contributor

@jnewbery jnewbery left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK faa3e2685a9c200188889e35843c65ec8338132f

Can be reviewed with

--word-diff-regex=. --ignore-all-space
@maflcko maflcko force-pushed the 2103-refactorMember branch from faa3e26 to fa2a80b Compare March 17, 2021 09:35
@jnewbery
Copy link
Contributor

utACK fa2a80b

1 similar comment
@amitiuttarwar
Copy link
Contributor

utACK fa2a80b

@maflcko maflcko merged commit 6834e02 into bitcoin:master Mar 18, 2021
@maflcko maflcko deleted the 2103-refactorMember branch March 18, 2021 08:07
sidhujag pushed a commit to syscoin/syscoin that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2021
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 18, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants