Skip to content

Conversation

@Sjors
Copy link
Member

@Sjors Sjors commented Nov 23, 2020

Followup for #20202, needed by #16546.

Allow the functional test suite to skip tests that require BDB, as well as introduce specific logic to handle whether BDB support is enabled or not. It follows the same pattern as skip_if_no_sqlite and is_sqlite_compiled.

@DrahtBot
Copy link
Contributor

The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

Conflicts

Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:

If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.

@laanwj
Copy link
Member

laanwj commented Nov 23, 2020

Code review ACK b87caf1

@maflcko maflcko merged commit 2ee954d into bitcoin:master Nov 23, 2020
sidhujag pushed a commit to syscoin/syscoin that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2020
@achow101
Copy link
Member

This was already being done in #20267

@maflcko
Copy link
Member

maflcko commented Nov 23, 2020

The commit looked identical apart from the docstring, so I thought you wouldn't mind too much if this was merged first.

@achow101
Copy link
Member

The commit looked identical apart from the docstring, so I thought you wouldn't mind too much if this was merged first.

Rebasing can be annoying :p

But yeah, it's fine.

@Sjors
Copy link
Member Author

Sjors commented Nov 24, 2020

Oops :-)

@Sjors Sjors deleted the 2020/11/use_bdb branch November 24, 2020 10:27
luke-jr pushed a commit to bitcoinknots/bitcoin that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2021
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 15, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants