[test] Add coverage to estimaterawfee and estimatesmartfee #13693
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
Concept ACK modulo removal of wildcard imports :-) |
Contributor
Author
|
Removed wildcard imports. Thanks! |
Contributor
Author
|
Rebased for #12257 |
Contributor
|
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers. ConflictsNo conflicts as of last run. |
Contributor
| The last travis run for this pull request was 277 days ago and is thus outdated. To trigger a fresh travis build, this pull request should be closed and re-opened. |
This adds light functional coverage to estimaterawfee - a subset of the testing applied to estimatesmartfee, and argument validation testing to both estimaterawfee and estimatesmartfee. One valid estimatesmartfee signature test is commented out because it fails currently.
Empact
force-pushed
the
test-estimatefee
branch
from
0f88f4d to
111880a
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Rebased, dropped unused reference in test |
Member
|
re-run ci |
sidhujag
pushed a commit
to syscoin/syscoin
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2020
…tesmartfee 111880a [test] Add coverage to estimaterawfee and estimatesmartfee (Ben Woosley) Pull request description: This adds light functional coverage to estimaterawfee - a subset of the testing applied to estimatesmartfee, and argument validation testing to both estimaterawfee and estimatesmartfee. One valid estimatesmartfee signature test is commented out because it fails currently. Extracted from bitcoin#12940 Top commit has no ACKs. Tree-SHA512: 361a883457b28b2dc75081666e49d6dc6b5d76eed40d858abe2dd4f35ece152cf1f99c94480a91f42a896aa2a73cf55f57921316fe66970b2d7ba691a3b17e2d
sidhujag
pushed a commit
to syscoin-core/syscoin
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2020
…tesmartfee 111880a [test] Add coverage to estimaterawfee and estimatesmartfee (Ben Woosley) Pull request description: This adds light functional coverage to estimaterawfee - a subset of the testing applied to estimatesmartfee, and argument validation testing to both estimaterawfee and estimatesmartfee. One valid estimatesmartfee signature test is commented out because it fails currently. Extracted from bitcoin#12940 Top commit has no ACKs. Tree-SHA512: 361a883457b28b2dc75081666e49d6dc6b5d76eed40d858abe2dd4f35ece152cf1f99c94480a91f42a896aa2a73cf55f57921316fe66970b2d7ba691a3b17e2d
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds light functional coverage to estimaterawfee - a subset of
the testing applied to estimatesmartfee, and argument validation
testing to both estimaterawfee and estimatesmartfee.
One valid estimatesmartfee signature test is commented out because it
fails currently.
Extracted from #12940