policy: Remove promiscuousmempoolflags #13527
Conversation
|
As a side note: The current implementation is broken anyway because it returns a dirty |
|
Concept ACK. |
|
I believe this increases overall test coverage. Clearly by removing (partly untested) code in ATMP the coverage increases there. Though, to the best of my knowledge the runtime error of ("TestBlockValidity failed") in |
|
I'm a bit rusty on all this code, but in principle I'm fine with no longer having that flag. Concept ACK |
|
utACK faa2444. I didn't review the test changes. |
|
After merging this there are still a couple mentions of Line 349 in 8803c91 bitcoin/test/lint/check-doc.py Line 25 in 8803c91 |
|
@fanquake This is wanted. We could remove those in the version that follows the version which includes this pull request. |
Note to reviewers: This pull request conflicts with the following ones:
If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first. |
|
utACK 870bd4c |
faa2444 policy: Remove promiscuousmempoolflags (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: It seems odd to clutter validation code with features that can only ever be used for testing (testnet or regtest). Removing that test-only code makes the mempool logic less painful to understand and easier to reason about when changed or refactored in the future. Tree-SHA512: 3b897aa9604ac8d82ebe9573c6efd468c93ddaa08d378ebc902e247b7aa6c68fcde71e5b449c08f17a067146cdc66dc50a67ce06d07607c27e5189a49c3fba3f
…r(...) 97ddc60 validation: Pass chainparams in AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(...) (practicalswift) Pull request description: Remove unused `CChainParams` argument in `AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(...)`. After the merge of #13527 ("policy: Remove promiscuousmempoolflags") yesterday the `CChainParams` argument is no longer used in `AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(...)`. Tree-SHA512: f1bab4498b64f0ab5230b8172f860df8fa8a302e4ee7385be4ba9c65a37cbc3ef640df78348c477169b9414e5c6a160a0b6471a11f4bb27921500ec208ef5340
faa2444 policy: Remove promiscuousmempoolflags (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: It seems odd to clutter validation code with features that can only ever be used for testing (testnet or regtest). Removing that test-only code makes the mempool logic less painful to understand and easier to reason about when changed or refactored in the future. Tree-SHA512: 3b897aa9604ac8d82ebe9573c6efd468c93ddaa08d378ebc902e247b7aa6c68fcde71e5b449c08f17a067146cdc66dc50a67ce06d07607c27e5189a49c3fba3f
6 participants
It seems odd to clutter validation code with features that can only ever be used for testing (testnet or regtest). Removing that test-only code makes the mempool logic less painful to understand and easier to reason about when changed or refactored in the future.