-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.7k
Drop ParseHashUV in favor of calling ParseHashStr #13422
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The one existing call already validates get_str will pass via checkObject.
Member
|
utACK abd2678 |
Contributor
Author
|
7 hours without a tag and I'm worried for the health and safety of @fanquake. :P |
Contributor
Author
|
Glad you're still with us! ;) |
Contributor
|
utACK abd2678. |
Contributor
Note to reviewers: This pull request conflicts with the following ones:
If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first. |
Merged
Member
|
utACK abd2678 |
maflcko
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 15, 2018
abd2678 Drop ParseHashUV in favor of calling ParseHashStr (Ben Woosley) Pull request description: The one existing call already validates `get_str` will pass via `checkObject`: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13422/files#diff-8fe4d6985ee4acf8bfc1ed8db1e83cb5L586 Split from #13420 Tree-SHA512: 35dfa8c28d0c3ceac7a6de7f4eb4a44d912f4c31f5d21c9438f899566ca2b34851f1a58c3417355e55d0c33abb97385f4a47e034bfc8e3cdbbf5f73813ca0582
PastaPastaPasta
pushed a commit
to PastaPastaPasta/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 7, 2020
abd2678 Drop ParseHashUV in favor of calling ParseHashStr (Ben Woosley) Pull request description: The one existing call already validates `get_str` will pass via `checkObject`: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13422/files#diff-8fe4d6985ee4acf8bfc1ed8db1e83cb5L586 Split from bitcoin#13420 Tree-SHA512: 35dfa8c28d0c3ceac7a6de7f4eb4a44d912f4c31f5d21c9438f899566ca2b34851f1a58c3417355e55d0c33abb97385f4a47e034bfc8e3cdbbf5f73813ca0582
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The one existing call already validates
get_strwill pass viacheckObject:https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13422/files#diff-8fe4d6985ee4acf8bfc1ed8db1e83cb5L586
Split from #13420