BIP to reserve nversion bits in blockheader#661
Conversation
|
|
||
| ==References== | ||
|
|
||
| - [[bip-0008.mediawiki|BIP8]] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please format using a * at the beginning of the line so this list renders correctly in mediawiki markup. Eg. code should be:
* [[bip-0008.mediawiki|BIP8]]
* [[bip-0009.mediawiki|BIP9]]
* [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1604.00575.pdf AsicBoost white paper]
* [https://github.com/BlockheaderNonce2/bitcoin/wiki nNonce2 proposal]
* [http://stratumprotocol.org/ Stratum protocol extension for version-rolling]
btcdrak
force-pushed
the
reservedbits
branch
2 times, most recently
from
3d3f944 to
b7864a1
Compare
jonathancross
left a comment
jonathancross
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
List formatting issue is resolved.
|
poolin.com already use |
|
ACK. This matches what is already in use by hardware and software. It makes sense to formalize it as a BIP. |
| Comments-Summary: No comments yet. | ||
| Comments-URI: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/wiki/Comments:BIP-???? | ||
| Status: Draft | ||
| Type: Informational |
|
|
||
| ==Backwards Compatibility== | ||
|
|
||
| This proposal is backwards compatible, and does not require a soft fork to implement. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's not backwards compatible, since software interprets these bits to indicate softforks.
|
@luke-jr Updated for your nits. Please can I have a BIP number assignment. |
|
@btcdrak check the word in the last sentence. "....bits for activation sinalling." |
7 participants
No description provided.