Skip to content

Comments

BIP-174: add SLIP-0019 fields#1434

Closed
louneskmt wants to merge 1 commit intobitcoin:masterfrom
louneskmt:bip174-slip19
Closed

BIP-174: add SLIP-0019 fields#1434
louneskmt wants to merge 1 commit intobitcoin:masterfrom
louneskmt:bip174-slip19

Conversation

@louneskmt
Copy link

The PSBT extension section of the SLIP-0019 has just been clarified and updated in satoshilabs/slips@019bcd6.

@murchandamus
Copy link
Member

@achow101: could you review this when you have a chance?

@achow101
Copy link
Member

achow101 commented May 1, 2024

Tend to NACK. IMO every non-proprietary PSBT field should be defined in a BIP. If you don't want to do that, use a proprietary field. I prefer to be very strict with that as otherwise we open up people to start defining their own fields and someone having to go and hunt down every unBIP'd usage of a field number, which is just an insane maintenance burden. We also want to avoid conflicting field numbers, so requiring everything to be a BIP will actually standardize what each field number means.

Note that field number 0x19 collides with proposed field numbers in #1540

@jonatack
Copy link
Member

jonatack commented May 1, 2024

Closing per BIP author feedback (thanks @achow101).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants