Skip to content

Problem: HTTP API docs wrong regarding the mode parameter#2481

Merged
ldmberman merged 2 commits intobigchaindb:masterfrom
ttmc:fix-docs-re-post-with-mode-async
Aug 27, 2018
Merged

Problem: HTTP API docs wrong regarding the mode parameter#2481
ldmberman merged 2 commits intobigchaindb:masterfrom
ttmc:fix-docs-re-post-with-mode-async

Conversation

@ttmc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ttmc ttmc commented Aug 27, 2018

Solution: Edit those docs to be accurate

In particular, note that the BigchainDB node always does a check of transaction validity before ever sending it to Tendermint and before doing any HTTP response.

Thanks to @ldmberman who noticed this error.

Solution: Edit those docs to be accurate
@ttmc ttmc self-assigned this Aug 27, 2018
@ttmc ttmc requested a review from ldmberman August 27, 2018 12:27
`Tendermint broadcast API
<https://tendermint.com/docs/tendermint-core/using-tendermint.html#broadcast-api>`_.

The meaning of the ``mode`` query parameter is inhereted from the mode parameter in
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

inherited

@codecov-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #2481 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2481   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.01%   91.01%           
=======================================
  Files          41       41           
  Lines        2383     2383           
=======================================
  Hits         2169     2169           
  Misses        214      214

@ldmberman ldmberman merged commit d78ff75 into bigchaindb:master Aug 27, 2018
@ttmc ttmc deleted the fix-docs-re-post-with-mode-async branch August 27, 2018 14:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants