Skip to content

Problem: The current shortnames are weird and hard to use/remember #32

@ttmc

Description

@ttmc

Problem Description

The current shortnames, such as 4/STANDARDIZE-DC and 6/SWP are hard to use and remember. Do you remember what DC or SWP stands for? Will you remember in a year?

Proposal

In practice, we've actually been using things like BEP4, BEP-4, BEP 4, or BEP#4, because that's much easier to say and to look up. The proposal is just to make that the official "short" way that we reference BEPs.

I think the Python community already does this when they refer to their PEPs, such as PEP-8.

Let's just change all the "shortname" labels to say BEP-N, where N is the BEP number.

Let's also do some searches for "1/C4" and "2/COSS" and replace those with BEP-1 and BEP-2. I think those are the only two shortnames we ever actually used.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions